From the Bookshelf of Complexity Explorer…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
No group discussions for this book yet.
What Members Thought

A wonderful book that describes the founding of the Santa Fe Institute and the origins of complexity science. After reading it, my response was, "this is what I want to do."
...more

I read this when it was first published back in the early 90’s. Along with Gleick’s “Chaos” book, these books literally changed my life and almost lead to an academic career. Going a bit deeper than Gleick, this book reads almost like a thriller - chronicling the early beginnings of the Santa Fe Institute (SFI) and the emergence of complexity sciences. I loved the pacing of the book as well as the noble quest to unify seemingly different but related sciences. A great book that’s aged well. My in
...more

A biographical account of the founding of the Santa Fe Institute that introduces the basic scientific concepts researched at the institute in its early days.
This book really resonated with me. I've been running into the phrase "complexity" in other books and articles I've been reading so it was nice to finally read something on Complexity Science. I will have to re-read it because a bunch of the science went over my head but all in all it was a fairly accessible volume.
I have a visual arts back ...more
This book really resonated with me. I've been running into the phrase "complexity" in other books and articles I've been reading so it was nice to finally read something on Complexity Science. I will have to re-read it because a bunch of the science went over my head but all in all it was a fairly accessible volume.
I have a visual arts back ...more

A good source for people who want to know more about some history of Complex Systems and Santa Fe Institute in particular. It would be better if the reader has a basic idea about the concepts and has encountered the names in the corresponding contexts, before encountering them in this book. In general, I believe that the pace of this book was rather slow; the information content was relatively lower than expected and the book could have been shortened without loss of information.

Oct 11, 2011
Martin Erlic
added it


Aug 19, 2014
Daniel Morales
marked it as to-read

Mar 20, 2018
Leonard
marked it as to-read

Mar 24, 2019
Llanet R.
marked it as to-read

Apr 03, 2019
Jason Swanson
marked it as to-read

Oct 17, 2020
Avi Roy
marked it as to-read