Foundation (Foundation, #1) in Reading the Classics

May 11, 2018 Ahtims rated it did not like it

Shelves: paperback-hardback, scifi-utopia-dystopia, series-part-of-a

Finished my most boring book so far in 2018..and I wonder whether my brain lacks SF processing cells.
The only thing I loved in the book was the intergalactic travel in the beginning and a few pages describing novel types of clothing and household equipment.
Am totally confused about Hari Seldon, Saldon Hardin and many others who graced the pages of this book.

Gist is that humanity has exploded and invaded all galaxies with a core government and Hari Saldon the psycho historian ( whatever that mea ...more

10 likes · Like · see review

Jan 04, 2014 Whitney rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: science-fiction

I enjoyed this book a lot and I think if you are a lover of Star Trek as I am you will love this book too. The mystery of finding out what would be the next step kept me turning the pages and helped me to finish Foundation quickly.

I cant wait to find out what the rest of the trilogy has in store for me.

I loved the way the book was written. It was very much movie like. Each chapter following a different character each scene a CUT TO.

I plan to re-read this at a latter date and hopefully have mor ...more

7 likes · Like · see review

Oct 08, 2013 Cee rated it liked it

Shelves: adult-fiction, science-fiction, series-that-are-finished

The Galactic Empire, which spans the entire galaxy, is going to crumble. It's inevitable. The only factor that humanity can influence is how long the period of chaos and destruction, which will follow the collapse of the Empire, will last.

Foundation is the second book I read by Isaac Asimov, I, Robot being the first. Again, this book seems to consist more of a series of connected short stories rather than one complete novel. Each story features a different set of characters in a different time, The Galactic Empire, which spans the entire galaxy, is going to crumble. It's inevitable. The only factor that humanity can influence is how long the period of chaos and destruction, which will follow the collapse of the Empire, will last.

Foundation is the second book I read by Isaac Asimov, I, Robot being the first. Again, this book seems to consist more of a series of connected short stories rather than one complete novel. Each story features a different set of characters in a different time, and often, a different place.

Asimov brings some pretty awesome ideas to the table - one of Foundation's main themes is that of psychohistory, which basically allows people to predict the future of large masses of people through mathematics. What I like about this "science" is that it's something plausible. This is basically what both psychology and economics attempt to do - to predict behaviour. In reality psychohistory is impossible because of the insane number of variables, but as a part of science-fiction I can definitely appreciate this invention.

Where I, Robot was more concerned with humanity, Foundation seems to point out how human history in many ways is cyclical. The collapse of the Galactic Empire brings the Roman Empire to mind, and the parallels between the role of Foundation in reducing the length of the "dark ages" after the collapse are clearly inspired by European history. On an intellectually historic, sociologic, and scientific level, Foundation offers a lot of food for thought, once one digs behind the surface of the story.

I have one problem with Asimov though.

Dude.

Why is there only one named female character in the entire book?

I have a certain level of understanding concerning books that have been written in earlier times. I don't expect them to espouse feminist ideals. I don't even expect the ladies in them to be equal to the male characters, because I know that in certain times, men and women were designated to other "spheres". But truly, I find it inexcusable the way Asimov's world is a fully masculine world, without a single woman that is actually part of the plot. The aforementioned named female is only used as comic relief, and rather poorly chosen comic relief as well.

Apart from the irrational lack of females, Asimov just does not write well-rounded characters. They do all sound exactly the same. I simply have a hard time truly liking a book that features more than eight undistinguishable male characters. They're mouth pieces for his ideas, and nothing more.

Asimov's ideas are great, but his storytelling is lacking in many ways. ...more

2 likes · Like · see review