From the Bookshelf of Classics for Beginners…

Frankenstein

Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley

Start date: October 1, 2013

Finish date: October 31, 2013

Discussion: Current Group Read

Why we're reading this: Voted for by you...
[close] Voted for by you...

Find A Copy At

Libraries

Group Discussions About This Book

Showing 2 of -4 topics — 818 comments total

Current Group Read

The Prince
By ☯Emily , moderator · 3 posts · 32 views

last updated Jun 08, 2019 03:47PM

April 2019: The Crucible
By ☯Emily , moderator · 10 posts · 40 views

last updated May 09, 2019 05:21AM

showing 10 of 25 topics view all »

What Members Thought

Oct 23, 2009 Danielle The Book Huntress rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: angsty-read, classic-horror, 2011-reading, classic, antihero, winter-cold-setting, gothic-fiction, owned-copy, zombie, kindle-book

Mary W. Shelley explored themes that still resonate today in her proto-science fiction work, Frankenstein. Themes of the relentless drive and search for ultimate (even forbidden) knowledge; intellectual arrogance; the desire to create something enduring; the need for love and recognition; and a study in how bitterness, hatred and rage can destroy a person. What separates men from God? What separates man from monster? Can a so-called monster have the heart (the humanity) and the accompanying need Mary W. Shelley explored themes that still resonate today in her proto-science fiction work, Frankenstein. Themes of the relentless drive and search for ultimate (even forbidden) knowledge; intellectual arrogance; the desire to create something enduring; the need for love and recognition; and a study in how bitterness, hatred and rage can destroy a person. What separates men from God? What separates man from monster? Can a so-called monster have the heart (the humanity) and the accompanying needs and desires of a man? Does beauty or ugliness penetrate deeper than the skin? Can one expect good to come from an act of utter selfishness?

Frankenstein is very much a philosophical work. Although there are some primordial science fiction elements, they are merely the impetus--the laying of the groundwork for this story. For it is not about how Frankenstein makes his creation. It’s about the aftermath of that act. This is a moving work of fiction that skirts the edges of horror, but the horror is more of a psychological sort. The horror is that a man would take knowledge to create a man from unliving flesh. A man so hideous in visage that people turn away in horror. This man chases after his creator, demands his love and tender regard, to merely be noticed and acknowledged by his creator; and if not that, at least the right to have a companion in his lonely life. Many times, I was deeply affected emotionally by this story. I felt so much sympathy for the creature. To be brought to life and abandoned by his creator seemed so cruel. He couldn’t help that his external appearance was ugly and a constant reminder of the unspeakable act his maker had perpetrated. He had not been given the opportunity to prove that he was something more, something worthwhile; that he was capable of deep emotions, an ability to appreciate beauty in life, to love and to give to others. This made me so very sad. There were times when I truly felt disdain towards Frankenstein. For his arrogance, for his selfishness. Although Shelley couldn’t have known about the capabilities of science now, the caution about science and its ethical considerations couldn’t be more timely. Should we create something just because we have the knowledge and skill to do so? And how often do we truly count the cost of such an action before it’s too late? Although I felt great enmity towards Frankenstein at times, I certainly didn’t condone the creature’s actions. I felt a profound sense of horror when the created man committed acts of violence to innocents around him in vengeance against his creator. I was still angry at Frankenstein for bringing it on himself, but I also felt sad for him to lose everyone he valued in his life. Surely, he couldn’t have known how horrible the results his creation act would result in. When he is given the ultimatum to create a mate for the creature, I could understand his terrible dilemma, and I still question whether his final actions were the right ones. Finally, I was back to feeling pity for the creature, deeply empathizing with him in his loneliness, how his desire for love and understanding turned into selfish rage that he truly regretted and repented for in the end.

Mary Shelley doesn’t give the answers to these moral dilemmas. She merely presents these profound queries in this narrative. Where does it place the reader in the end? Deeply entrenched within this tumultuous, roiling cauldron of emotions—fear, love, rage, regret, hope, and despair. One simply cannot be detached when reading this book.

I found this to be very readable despite the fact that it was written about two hundred years ago. I only found my interest wavering in the moments of the somewhat excessive travelogues of the natural surroundings. In my opinion, this took up too prominent a role in the narrative, and it was distracting. Despite that small shortcoming, this was powerful reading, not comfortable, but deeply involving. No easy answers, but lots of questions for each reader to process and come up with their own conclusions. I won’t forget this book.

4.5 stars.
...more

66 likes · Like · see review

Oct 10, 2013 Michael rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: favorites, this-years-books, novels, fantasy-supernatural, classics

“You are my creator, but I am your master; - obey!”

Picking up this book I knew it was released in 1818. I wonder would I be able to relate or even make it thorough the book? This is a book that's creatures has worked it way in one form or another into our popular culture and for the most part it is mostly wrong. People mistakenly call the creature Frankenstein, very little time in the book is spent on making of the creature and for the most part the fact that it is intelligent creature that can ...more

2 likes · Like · see review

Apr 01, 2013 Emma rated it really liked it

Frankenstein was written during the 'Romantic Period' which was a period of great change, revolutions and radical thinking. A figure of inspiration to the Romantics was the Greek Myth of Prometheus. In order to help humankind, Prometheus stole Zeus's fire from the sun and was severely punished by Zeus. Also there is the myth of Prometheus plasticator who was believed to have been created and given life by humankind out of clay. Like Prometheus, Victor Frankenstein goes against the gods by creati ...more

1 like · Like · see review

Feb 17, 2009 Circa Girl rated it it was amazing

Shelves: classics

This is the saddest book I've ever read. I tried it out for the R.I.P. Challenge expecting it to follow along the lines of the famous film but it has so much more depth. I actually found myself tearing up a bit at some parts. I'm sure there's a million ways to interpret the relationship between the monster, frankenstein, and society but I personally picked up on the message that evil is nurtured (by rejection, hate, neglect,ect. from society) not created. ...more

1 like · Like · see review

Nov 11, 2009 Juergen John Roscher rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: read_2009

Read this book for a Book Discussion Club.

I liked this book – Frankenstein by Mary Shelley - giving it a four-star rating out of five stars. I thought I was familiar with Frankenstein’s monster through its ubiquitous euse during Halloween and in modern pop culture; but had never read the book or seen the movie. The closest I had come to any understanding of this story was from watching the move “Young Frankenstein”, so it was a surprise to find out there was little to no relationship between tha Read this book for a Book Discussion Club.

I liked this book – Frankenstein by Mary Shelley - giving it a four-star rating out of five stars. I thought I was familiar with Frankenstein’s monster through its ubiquitous euse during Halloween and in modern pop culture; but had never read the book or seen the movie. The closest I had come to any understanding of this story was from watching the move “Young Frankenstein”, so it was a surprise to find out there was little to no relationship between that movie and the book.

I found the book to be much better than I anticipated it to be because of the character driven plot following the life of Victor Frankenstein and his monster. The three main characters – Walton, Frankenstein and the monster each propelled the story through the introduction, creation of the monster, the education of the monster, the retaliation of the monster against the creator, and finally the finale of both the creator and creation.

The main theme that I found in this story is the acquisition and use of knowledge without any ethical or moral restraints. Victor Frankenstein had discovered the secret of creating life but was not restrained by any ethical or moral constraints in using it until after the creation. He further lacked any moral courage to confront the monster or the deeds of the monster until others had been killed. He was not willing to include others in the knowledge of the monster until so much death and destruction had been done to those around himself. To me this book symbolized the need to have moral/ethical/religious training in parallel with schooling and research. Just because we can do certain things does not mean that we should do them, especially when it comes to dealing with critical issues with life.

Another aspect of the novel was how the creator (Victor Frankenstein) and the creation (Monster) ended up being so intertwined and similar. Both ended up as miserable cowards that blamed others for their misfortune.

I would recommend this novel to those who love horror books. Especially, I suggest this book for those who are looking for a horror book that does not graphically depict carnage, destruction, and death. Also, I believe this book would be beneficial to those who are looking to examine the relationship between use of knowledge and the ethical use of knowledge.
...more

Like · see review