From the Bookshelf of ~Can't Stop Reading~…

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (Millennium, #1)

Stieg Larsson,

Reg Keeland (Translator)

Start date: September 1, 2012

Finish date: September 30, 2012

Discussion: Current Group Reads

Why we're reading this: September novel
[close] September novel

Find A Copy At

Libraries

Group Discussions About This Book

Showing 2 of 2 topics — 39 comments total

Current Group Reads

The Kite Runner
By Jonathan , A dream within a dream · 5 posts · 80 views

last updated Aug 11, 2015 11:08AM

Middlesex
By Jonathan , A dream within a dream · 4 posts · 68 views

last updated Nov 25, 2014 02:05PM

showing 2 of 2 topics view all »

What Members Thought

Nov 20, 2011 Marsha Cornelius rated it liked it

This will be the third time I have tried to get into this book. Have found the beginning so tedious I can't get past the first 30 pages. This time I vow to read to 75 pages before I give up for the last time. ...more

1 like · Like · see review

Mar 27, 2012 QuietIdea rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: mystery, books-with-adaptations

If your edition of this book is any thing like mine, it'll be decorated with rave reviews from critics who throw about words like "thrilling" and "sexy" and "addictive". These critics were clearly on the take.

This book's only saving grace, is its characters. I love flawed characters and this book had plenty of them. Mikeal Blomkvist, adulterous and a bad father, yet tortured by morals. Lisbeth Salander, no morals, frequently victimized, hacker extraordinaire. Not to mention the rapists, murderer If your edition of this book is any thing like mine, it'll be decorated with rave reviews from critics who throw about words like "thrilling" and "sexy" and "addictive". These critics were clearly on the take.

This book's only saving grace, is its characters. I love flawed characters and this book had plenty of them. Mikeal Blomkvist, adulterous and a bad father, yet tortured by morals. Lisbeth Salander, no morals, frequently victimized, hacker extraordinaire. Not to mention the rapists, murderers, anti-semites, and traitors. Unfortunately, most of the character arent fully developed until halfway through the story and by then you're bored bonkers, waiting for the good stuff to happen.

The book starts - skimming over important things like character introductions - by presenting you with a character dialogue about another character dialogue. Basically this story starts by having a character you don't really know tell you a story about a guy he didn't really know, giving him insider information on a crook named Wennerstrom. Which had the potential to be fascinating but wasn't...because for much of this the conversations are purely factual sentences with no personality shining through. You simply are asked to take an unknown character named Blomkvist, at his word simply because he's the main character...which you could do, but you are also asked to take a long lost friend on his word about his inside info to shady undertakings, which is in itself shady. Confused yet? Because that's just firs 60 or so pages.

So you read on, thinking this Wennerstrom thing could get interesting when the reality is, Vanger family is about to offer up an entirely different and unrelated mystery. Bye-bye Wennerstrom. Thanks for boring me. Hello, new slightly less boring people.

Was the book "sexy"? No, not really. If your a rape fetishist, maybe. Because a central theme of the story, is men who hate women...which in turn leads to some pretty angry men doing god-awful things to unsuspecting women. Mikael Blomkvist is a womanizer - at least I can give him his props for being upfront about his need for casual sex as his character begins to develop long at last - who does have sex throughout the book but its really not sexy, because its merely hinted at...Which means the writer could have just mentioned his characters sexual proclivities and moved on with the story and saved the ink but I digress on that matter.

Was the book "thrilling"? It was about as thrilling as a early 90s episode of Law&Order, when those writers were still unsure of just how far they'd be allowed to take crime on tv. It was very analytical, which would probably have served better if the leading man was a detective instead of a reporter. One seen has him carrying a conversation with a serial killer, and all I can think is: Is this it?

Addictive? Not even close. There was no suspense forcing me to keep flipping pages, to convince me to forsake eating and sleeping to find out more...If anything I found other activities to help me avoid having to read the story... Including watching the movie which was fantastic! Cool music, fight scenes, sex scenes, a mystery that made you half afraid to look at the evidence being pieced together...

And there was a solid plot. with great clues. and no question was left hanging that shouldn't have been (eventually the Vanger family mystery gets solved, and the character decide to solve the Wennerstrom thing too). But there were too many facts, too soon and too little personality in characters who -according to the facts- should have been overflowing with it. too many facts slowed down the progression of the story and plot twists that arrived were gifts to break the monotony than actual surprises. I'm very sad to say that this story could have gone a lot farther with a lot less...I wanted to like it so badly but couldn't.

Will I read the next one? I'll probably wait, see the movie first and then decide if its worth it. ...more

Like · see review

Jul 27, 2011 Jessica rated it it was amazing

I thoroughly enjoyed this book. It was a bit of a long read and took some hanging in there through the boring bits, but in the end it was worth it.
I love the characters for who they are. They are not your normal dashing/gorgeous hero or heroine. They are real people and I like that about them.

Like · see review