From the Bookshelf of Should have read classics…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
No group discussions for this book yet.
What Members Thought
The book was a recommendation read , and I was told it is in parallel to Holden Caulfield(Catcher In the Rye).
Completing the first 100 pages was a pain as nothing was leading to anywhere. After 100 odd pages, I found things making sense. But the way the piece of writing has been formed, i.e. in the description of the characters, is annoying. But I must say I have first time seen a book which goes by the description of the characters, rather then the events.I had to slog through it.Some events ar ...more
Completing the first 100 pages was a pain as nothing was leading to anywhere. After 100 odd pages, I found things making sense. But the way the piece of writing has been formed, i.e. in the description of the characters, is annoying. But I must say I have first time seen a book which goes by the description of the characters, rather then the events.I had to slog through it.Some events ar ...more
Apr 14, 2011
Marna Bynum
marked it as to-read
Apr 17, 2011
Kat
marked it as to-read
May 18, 2011
Courtney
marked it as to-read
Jun 11, 2011
Julie C
marked it as to-read
Aug 31, 2011
Library Lady 📚
added it
Sep 23, 2011
Michael Anson
marked it as to-read
Nov 24, 2011
Azalea
marked it as to-read
Nov 27, 2011
Mandy
marked it as to-read
Dec 03, 2011
Shannon
marked it as to-read
Oct 05, 2012
Mihaela
marked it as to-read
Jan 16, 2013
Jess
marked it as to-read
May 11, 2013
Joy Gerbode
marked it as to-read
Aug 09, 2013
Lily Moon
marked it as to-read
Nov 22, 2015
Sorento62
marked it as to-read
