From the Bookshelf of Should have read classics…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
showing 1 of 1 topics
view all »
Other topics mentioning this book
What Members Thought

Maybe I should have read the edition with the explanatory notes (I read the ebook version), because I didn't quite understand what it was all about. I also found a lot the sentences so long that I had to read them a two or three times before I understood them.
...more

Nothing like an ambiguous classic to get the analysis wheels turning. Ghosts? Psychotic break? Hmmm... I'll think on this a bit. Fun Victorian thriller with excessive punctuation.
...more

Creepy and a little baffling.

Oct 19, 2011
Renee Robinson
marked it as to-read

Dec 19, 2011
Elizabeth Stultz
marked it as to-read

May 18, 2012
Manda
marked it as to-read

Oct 27, 2012
Michael Piggott
marked it as to-read

Dec 16, 2014
Ashley
marked it as to-read


Dec 08, 2015
Agnese
marked it as to-read

Oct 10, 2020
Miriam
rated it
really liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
bicoastal-book-club

Jan 31, 2019
Mark
marked it as to-read

Feb 13, 2019
Faith Gudal
is currently reading it

Oct 10, 2020
Tracy
marked it as to-read

Sep 25, 2022
Anne
is currently reading it