From the Bookshelf of Should have read classics…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
showing 1 of 1 topics
view all »
Other topics mentioning this book
What Members Thought
Maybe I should have read the edition with the explanatory notes (I read the ebook version), because I didn't quite understand what it was all about. I also found a lot the sentences so long that I had to read them a two or three times before I understood them.
...more
Nothing like an ambiguous classic to get the analysis wheels turning. Ghosts? Psychotic break? Hmmm... I'll think on this a bit. Fun Victorian thriller with excessive punctuation.
...more
Creepy and a little baffling.
Oct 19, 2011
Renee Robinson
marked it as to-read
Dec 19, 2011
Elizabeth Stultz
marked it as to-read
May 18, 2012
Manda
marked it as to-read
Oct 27, 2012
Michael Piggott
marked it as to-read
Dec 16, 2014
Ashley
marked it as to-read
Dec 08, 2015
Agnese
marked it as to-read
Oct 10, 2020
Miriam
rated it
really liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
bicoastal-book-club
Jan 31, 2019
Mark
marked it as to-read
Feb 13, 2019
Faith
is currently reading it
Oct 10, 2020
Tracy
marked it as to-read
Sep 25, 2022
Anne
is currently reading it


















