From the Bookshelf of Queereaders

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Kassa
Apr 22, 2010 rated it really liked it
I’d never heard of this book until it started showing up on a lot of author lists of their top 10 favorite books of all time. It’s been described as a gay classic and authentic to San Francisco in the 1970’s. Since this story was first published in the newspaper as a serial in the 1970’s, it has gone on to be a miniseries that garnered several award nominations. Even reading the book today, it remains a whimsical delight that clearly set the stage for many such spin offs in the future. The begin ...more
Jan
Jul 15, 2012 rated it liked it
Deliciously dated to my childhood/adolescence in the seventies, this book was more enjoyable for the flashes of recognition of seventies brands and movements and of places I know in San Francisco than for characterization, plot, or writing, all of which were facile but thin. Nor did the queer characters bear any particular resemblance to anyone I've known in my life. It's a good old-fashioned genre soap opera, and I might read the next volume (*More Tales of the City*) someday as a guilty pleasu ...more
Sonja
Oct 22, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: e-read
looove this! truly is like an addictive, sparkly soap-opera, but gayer! it took me awhile to get my head around all the characters - there are A LOT and they all have weird names - but once you get into it, it's addictive. a few pop-culture references were lost on me as this was set almost 40 years ago now, but the spirit is still there.
can't wait to read the next seven books. haha
...more
Konner
Sep 08, 2021 rated it really liked it
Shelves: queer
I listened to the audiobook read by the author. I enjoyed the story and the feeling of of being immersed in San Francisco’s culture way back when, but Maupin’s writing style doesn’t lend itself to being an audiobook. There are no breaks between scenes or chapters, hardly a pause in the reading, so it’s difficult to keep track of who is speaking to who. The dialogue is fast paced back and forth, sometimes I couldn’t tell who was saying which line. I recommend reading the physical book of you’re a ...more
Paul Jr.
Oct 12, 2009 rated it it was amazing
Classic and addicting in all the right ways. Memorable characters that feel like family
Michael
Meh. Super dated and the characters are only interesting in fits and starts.
Matthew
Apr 08, 2009 rated it really liked it
Shelves: read-2009, queers
Ryan
Jun 19, 2009 rated it really liked it
Jeff
Aug 03, 2009 marked it as to-read
Luna Solaris
Oct 18, 2009 marked it as to-read
Deidre
Feb 17, 2010 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites
Dave
Mar 06, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Jeff
Jun 06, 2011 is currently reading it  ·  review of another edition
Thom Watson
Jun 19, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: lgbt, re-read, favorites
Mario Garcia
Jul 26, 2011 rated it really liked it
Thomas
Aug 23, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Jerry Delaney
Feb 12, 2012 rated it really liked it
KLS
Apr 20, 2012 marked it as to-read
Ben
Feb 02, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Thomas
Aug 18, 2013 marked it as to-read
Jacob
Feb 06, 2014 marked it as to-read
Sigi
Feb 24, 2014 rated it really liked it
Erik Moscoso
Jan 02, 2015 marked it as to-read
Libby
Feb 21, 2017 rated it really liked it
Ron Mohring
May 29, 2017 rated it liked it
Sara
Jul 28, 2017 marked it as to-read
Frank van Kalmthout
Apr 14, 2019 rated it it was amazing