From the Bookshelf of The Alternative Worlds

Only Forward
by
Start date
June 1, 2013
Finish date
June 30, 2013
Why we're reading this
Group Read selection for June 2013

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Nicky
Apr 04, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Oh -- my -- god. When I started reading this book I expected it to keep up the fairly light tone of the early chapters. Then it fucked with my heart bad. Don't believe reviews saying it makes no sense: it makes perfect sense, in the end, as long as you stop holding onto normal logic and start applying some dream logic. The narrator is unreliable, yeah, and he has attitude, and he knows he's telling a story, so there are bits that some people find irritating, like the way he keeps saying he'll te ...more
Ryandake
May 31, 2012 rated it liked it
i want to take a pair of scissors to this book.

not to make confetti, or compost, of it, but to rearrange it.

the author is introducing quite central new characters on page 320, fer chrissakes! the last 15 or so pages of the book are a firehose of infodump (well-written infodump, but still), the streams of which tie the book together.

but how much better it could have been if those streams were introduced earlier as rills... it would have ameliorated the worst problems of the beginning, and made th
...more
Daniel Roy
What a perplexing book. On the one hand, I certainly have never read anything quite like it; but then there are tons of aspects of the book that are irritating and unsatisfying, making the novel fall well short of brilliance.

The novel starts as an Adams-esque science fictional satire, complete with home appliances with snappy personalities. My suspension of disbelief wrestled with the setting for a while, until I accepted that it was satirical and surreal, and thus should not be expected to make
...more
Kurt
Jan 30, 2015 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites
It is rare that I read a book like this anymore because i've already read it if it exists or i know of it and am just not interested in it. Thus i read modern stuff because who wants to read mediocre old stuff when u could read new stuff that may not be merely mediocre? This is a nineties book through and through and that's all i'm gonna say. There is absolutely NO way u could predict the course of this novel, not knowing anything going into it. And that's how it should be read. In fact i've alr ...more
Suz
I thought I was going to hate this book, and initially, I didn't care for it. The slow build up or explanation of the world that is not-quite-ours was a little tedious and boring. A little too cliche, until the cliches worked.

It's a (murder?) mystery-thriller-psychological horror -thing. It is very imaginative, and once I got past the fact that it wasn't a real world (as far as I'm concerned), it got interesting. I think the p-sychological bits of it were the most interesting, and I did end up l
...more
Kelly
May 01, 2013 rated it really liked it
Shelves: sci-fi
3.5 stars.

Good. Very interesting. Felt a little lacking in something but I can't quite put my finger on it right now. Further thoughts coming...
...more
Richard
Aug 31, 2008 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Ubik
Oct 14, 2008 marked it as to-read
Julie S.
Feb 06, 2011 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
mark monday
Jan 14, 2013 marked it as to-read
Eric
Mar 27, 2013 marked it as to-read
Camille
Apr 01, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sci-fi-fantasy
Denise
Apr 04, 2013 rated it liked it
Gianni
May 25, 2013 marked it as to-read
Figgy
Jan 12, 2014 marked it as owned-but-not-read
Maria
Dec 16, 2014 marked it as to-read
Andy
Apr 24, 2015 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Lori
Sep 09, 2017 marked it as to-read
Peter
Feb 07, 2019 marked it as to-read