From the Bookshelf of Science and Inquiry…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
June-July 2012 - Godel Escher Bach
By Betsy , co-mod · 126 posts · 796 views
By Betsy , co-mod · 126 posts · 796 views
last updated Jun 08, 2024 07:09PM
December 2012 Emperor of All Maladies
By Betsy , co-mod · 23 posts · 233 views
By Betsy , co-mod · 23 posts · 233 views
last updated Feb 16, 2020 09:48PM
showing 9 of 9 topics
view all »
Other topics mentioning this book
What science book is your most recent read? What do you think about it? Pt. 1
By deleted member · 749 posts · 781 views
last updated May 14, 2013 01:49AM
Who are we? Introduce Yourself. #1
By William · 774 posts · 1270 views
last updated Aug 23, 2014 02:59PM
What science book is your most recent read? What do you think about it? Pt. 2
By Betsy , co-mod · 633 posts · 1017 views
last updated Mar 22, 2019 03:22PM
*
Who are we? Introduce Yourself. #2
By Betsy , co-mod · 684 posts · 1270 views
last updated Jan 02, 2023 05:28PM
October 2020 - Blank Slate
By Betsy , co-mod · 15 posts · 101 views
By Betsy , co-mod · 15 posts · 101 views
last updated Dec 09, 2020 05:18PM
What Members Thought
في هذا الكتاب يتحدث ستيفن بنكر أستاذ العلوم الإدراكية وعالم النفس بشكل أساسي عن نظرية العقل الحسابية
computational theory of the mind
بالعربي، الرجل يتحدث عن العقل (ليس المخ) من وجهة نظر أخرى غير اعتيادية. وجهة نظر تطورية. فيفسر العمليات الادراكية داخل العقل بقوى تطورية (داروينية) وبقوانين حاسويبة.
النظريات التي طرحها وتحدث عنها بنكر رائعة وطريقة شرحها أروع
قد يكون عنوان الكتاب مضلل بعض الشي. لكنه كتاب يستحق القراءة
computational theory of the mind
بالعربي، الرجل يتحدث عن العقل (ليس المخ) من وجهة نظر أخرى غير اعتيادية. وجهة نظر تطورية. فيفسر العمليات الادراكية داخل العقل بقوى تطورية (داروينية) وبقوانين حاسويبة.
النظريات التي طرحها وتحدث عنها بنكر رائعة وطريقة شرحها أروع
قد يكون عنوان الكتاب مضلل بعض الشي. لكنه كتاب يستحق القراءة
It took me six months to get through this book. There are alot of ideas covered, so it seems fitting to go through it slowly. Plus, even in paperback, the tome is hefty and not suitable of commute-reading. I really appreciate the Notes and References at the back. I nearly abandoned the book after reading Chapter 2. I suspect there are concepts on computational thinking that I just am not familiar enough with to understand, but also Pinker took on a combative tone that was equally incomprehensibl
...more
Meh. There were some interesting parts, but overall, this book left me quite disappointed. I suppose I was hoping for, and expecting, more of "how the BRAIN works." This book felt like a lot of philosophy and guess work rather than science. There was a lot of rambling that I had a hard time seeing the purpose of. Overall, not one that I would recommend.
...more
Awesome. It completely delivers on it's title.
...more
Dec 20, 2009
Mag
added it
Mar 17, 2010
Eric
marked it as to-read
Apr 25, 2010
James
marked it as want-to-read
Feb 05, 2011
Elizabeth
marked it as to-read
Sep 19, 2011
Alexis
marked it as to-read
Feb 25, 2012
Ka
marked it as to-read
Apr 29, 2012
Persephone
marked it as to-read
Jul 05, 2012
Tatjana Rosandić
marked it as to-read
Oct 14, 2012
Marie
marked it as to-read
Nov 20, 2012
Valerie
marked it as to-read
