Jlawrence’s
Comments
(group member since Mar 08, 2010)
Jlawrence’s
comments
from the The Sword and Laser group.
Showing 621-640 of 964

I like how the event information mentions: "Sorry, folks, no memorabilia, swords, or other items; BOOKS ONLY".

That's the best I can currently do. I only got my ukulele three weeks ag..."
WOW!! I wish I had seen this yesterday... putting it on the blog now!
I love it, Anne! Woot! :D
Reading the Dictionary of Fantastic Art - I'm pretty familiar with the surrealists, but there's many artists in this little book I've never been exposed to - having fun making a list of artists I want to check out now. Mona Lisa Overdrive is also waiting in the wings.

I too have yelled obscenities at a SquareSpace blog over that problem, so fortunately I had a solution at hand. :)

Someday I will finish the Mists of Avalon, I promise!"
Someday Veronica will finish Memoirs Found in the Bath..."
I think that day might be the day after the heat death of our universe...
I haven't skipped anything outright, but I did give up on Eye of the World and Once and Future King (I cheated on both those quizzes...shhhh).

Oh, snap."
I've only see the movie version of Battle Royale, but I think it will be interesting to compare how The Hunger Games sets things up.
Really enjoyed the NKJ interview, too - the chances of my reading the sequels have significantly increased.

On page 627 of WMF, so I'm closing in as well. I haven't looked at the HTK discussions yet either. Hopefully the HTK won't be all discussioned-out by the time we visit there. ;)


Woot! I got my guilting ability from my mother :)"
Guilting Skill rank + 1!
I'm trying to finish up Wise Man's Fear so I can then catch up on Hundred Thousand Kindgdoms before everyone else finishes it. :P

Agree with others that the ending and some other aspects felt rushed. The vampire thing I'm torn on - I actually kind of liked the role that character played in the group dynamic, but I think it would have served Watts better if that 'subspecies' were called something else, and had the *nickname* of vampires.
My favorite part was probably early-on when Rorschach was 'speaking' to them, and the crew was trying to puzzle it out - that was just really engrossing, eerie and fun.
Despite its various flaws, it did keep me interested in plowing through, and gave me a little bit of stuff to chew on thought-wise, so three out of five lasers.

What makes the books work so well for me is the blend of a grittier, more-realistic feel with characters than nonetheless have that kind of larger-than-life glow of high fantasy heroes (while also being complex and human).
I think the series has got the gritty, realistic-feeling aspect down pat, and that works well for drawing viewers in and helping them believe in that world. But it kind of uses that matter-of-fact tone for *everything*, and thus both the characters and their actions lose that larger-than-life-but-still-relatable feel that made the books so gripping. I think there would be someway to maintain that blend, even with all the compression needed for the tv series format.
Think of the feel of Jackson's Lord of the Rings adaptation - that has that high-fantasy, larger-than-life glow in spades (I'm talking about the tone of the thing, not the fact that Jackson had 5 bajillion more dollars to spend on it). I guess I was imagining someone midpoint between that feel and the matter-of-fact feel the GoT tv series is actually providing. There's just a certain lack of resonance.
Or maybe it simply is a matter of character development loss. Either way, I was completely engrossed by the fate of these characters in the book, whereas in the tv series, it's interesting to watch, but I feel nowhere near as engrossed.


Though it would have only barely resembled the source, I also would have loved to have seen what Alejandro Jodorowsky would have done with Dune, especially with Jean 'Moebius' Giraud, HR Geiger and Chris Foss doing the production design, and Salavador Dali slated to play the Emperor.


However, the line between a) and b) is also fuzzy and shifting, since some things that appear to be "explorations of unsolvable puzzles" upon a first read can resolve into jigsaw pieces of a solvable puzzle upon a re-read. Because of the richness of these books, I'm betting the line would shift again with a third read. But I would also agree some things, especially those dealing with the slippery nature of Severian's "true" self and "true" memory, would remain in category b).

So I think Watts meant it to remain ambiguous, and to also tie into the question of 'what is the nature & value of consciousness and the self?' (I think Watts exploration of that question through this book was interesting, if uneven.)

aldenoneil, it looks you can subscribe via the rss link:
http://webcast.berkeley.edu/media/com...