Michael’s
Comments
(group member since Nov 18, 2010)
Michael’s
comments
from the The Extra Cool Group! (of people Michael is experimenting on) group.
Showing 121-140 of 183

Bloggers/Vloggers/Lit Crits: conflicts of interests? (It makes sense when you read the question)
(30 new)
Nov 27, 2010 10:26AM

Questions.
(1) How do you feel about reviewers who have book review blogs, and use double-posted goodreads reviews to try and direct more traffic to their blogs? Would you accept a friend request from one? (
2) What about actual, print book reviewers? Do they have a place on goodreads? Is it different from the place of other reviewers? Why or why not?

Because this group is only for extra cool people, and extra cool people aren't also tattle-tales. BTW, what's up with people dissing rhetorical questions in this group? Y'all realize I'm a rhetoric student, right? I'm super offended right now. I'm gonna go tell goodreads on y'all.

Since I don't pay much attention to the "follow" option, I don't follow anyone except Margaret Atwood. I suppose I agree with Ryan's perception of the word "follow," mixed in with a little of Jasmine's: if I were to follow someone, I would feel like a stalker (even though they KNOW I'm following them), and I would feel like I was telling them I didn't want to really get to know them, just wanted to read their reviews.
When I'm being followed, I percieve it a little differently...I percieve my followers as people who probably won't talk to me and usually don't vote either, but who have liked a review or more of mine. I often take a look at their profiles, but I've only friended my followers on two occasions when they also were people who interacted with me. I usually assume followers want to stay off my radar unless they show me otherwise, so they usually DO stay off my radar.
I used to friend people a lot more frequently than I do now. It used to be based on one or two interesting reviews, but now I usually only friend people who I've both interacted with and enjoyed reviews by. Because I have trouble keeping up with reviews as it is, I'm in no hurry to add more friends unless I feel they're going to be highly valuable friends. However, I only turn down friends who make it blatant that they're just friend-horders or who want to sell me shit.
Nov 27, 2010 08:41AM

And, experienced authors will also see it this way. There's definitely a little bit of politics involved, though, when you have friends who are both on goodreads and have written books. I don't know what I'll do the first time I read a 2-star book by a goodreads friend, and I don't know if I'll be tempted to water down my opinions. Have you reviewed books by any "friends?"


Well, your name is extra cool, which gets you bonus points.
I'm genuinely curious about the conflict, not trying to ask leading or rhetorical questions.
What's wrong with retorical questions, Mrs. Mieville?

And you call yourself a vote whore.

Nov 25, 2010 12:58PM




Nope, you've already given some good, thoughtful responses. Even if some ideas are similar to what other people have said, I think that everyone (who wanders into this group) voicing their thoughts will give a better sense of what MOST people do, what SOME people do, and what ONLY THE PSYCHOS do. I won't say where you fall right now...

Nov 24, 2010 06:32PM

BTW, Ryan, your Wheel of Time reviews have been really interesting, even though I can't stand that book series.
Nov 24, 2010 02:55PM

Hear, hear. I don't understand how anybody can get hooked on that site. *Continues to ignore essay due tonight in favor of playing on goodreads.*