Dwayne’s
Comments
(group member since Apr 01, 2017)
Dwayne’s
comments
from the Support for Indie Authors group.
Showing 1,941-1,960 of 4,443

Agreed. That's what made me think Kimika Kuu-Bo was the main character and the rest were side characters.

That's definitely something you will want to put in the blurb. Some people love novels like that and it will draw in those readers. Some people hate it, which will save you getting a lot of one star reviews from those readers if they are forewarned.
A Song of Ice & Fire Book 1: A Game of Thrones I'm only vaguely familiar with what that is. I know it's a book written by George (something something) Martin and a lot of characters die and it's been turned into some kind of TV series, so it's hard to imagine it or Ned Stark.
Maybe a bit more about each character (or at least three of them) and each story-line is needed, then. Generally, I am all in favor of short blurbs, but in a case such as your book, you might need to have a long blurb.

I feel like I get a sense of a story in the first paragraph, even though it's a bit vague as to why everyone's life is in danger and one of the characters has to fight against her past. The second paragraph is a mess of vagueness and a lot of characters being tossed about. Is Taylana a distant world or a princess? What is her perfect world and why is it a nightmare? Instead of telling us, you move on to something about Enforcer Agent Marco and his problems with some government. (Is this still Taylana?) And it goes on with more characters and more situations.
Focus on the main story and one or two major characters. Remember, we don't know these people or anything about them. You have to find a way to get us interested. Draw a reader into your book before you introduce the side characters and sub-plots.

It means what it says. If you start a thread in the cover workshop folder, do not add a blurb. The cover workshop folder is for covers only.
Does your book have a title, by any chance? We ask (it's in the rules) that you format the heading of your post: "Blurb Help - Genre / Title". Thanks.

Not if I beat you to it. We're all adults here, people. It's fine if you choose to swear or not to swear in your writing, but it's not okay to knock other writers because they do something differently.

Words are words, Brian. A writer uses words. Sure, it's okay if a writer chooses not to use certain words for whatever reason, but it's not okay to say a writer is in the "wrong job" just because they use words you don't care for.
Brian wrote: "Great literature, by and large, manages to get by without it."
"Great" is a bit subjective, but most would consider John Steinbeck a great writer. Even he let the word "fuck" fly now and again. Great literature is not made or broken by the level of profanity in it.


And that's fine. I'm not doubting that there are aspects of the story that are medical or horror. I'm just saying the cover does not really reflect that. If I didn't know better, I would guess the story is fantasy or maybe a paranormal mystery, especially with the rainbow sparkles in the middle one. They are nice covers, they just do not reflect the genre you are writing.








Actually, there have been a fair amount of studies done on this notion in recent years and the conclusions, at least those I'm familiar with, are unanimous. People who swear often have a higher intelligence and a greater vocabulary. But, even if you are right, what you believe actually creates a great case for allowing characters with poor vocabulary to let a blue word fly out of their mouths now and then.
"...and degrades a character."
How?
Currently I'm working on a novel in which a team of teenagers are working in corn fields in Iowa in the mid 1980s. This is something I am familiar with as I was a teen working in corn fields in the 1980s. Swearing was common out there. In fact, I'm trying to tone it down some for the novel. After all, we're talking fifty teenagers far out of the hearing range any real adult. Of course, they're going to let the salty language fly. Some of us thought we were cool for swearing, some thought it made them sound tougher, some thought it was just funny to swear. I would not be true to the characters if I were to have them saying, "Oh, gosh, oh golly, this is hard work" or, "Why in the jeepers creepers do we have to work in the rain?" or, "Leave me alone, you doody-head, You're being a niddy-bip. Snickerdoodle you!"
I need to stop. I am turning into Annie Wilkes here.
Bottom line, Caryl, if an author chooses to use profanity in their work, that is fine. If not, that is fine, too. Neither is an indication of poor vocabulary and neither is degrading to character.