Maureen’s
Comments
(group member since Mar 02, 2009)
Maureen’s
comments
from the fiction files redux group.
Showing 241-260 of 683


I don't know Dan's."
Kerry. Definitely a recognizable cover -- I had actually expected a real twist on the story instead of just a generous dollop of zombies added to key scenes. Having barely survived the reading of two P&P sequels, I suppose I should have known better.
Re: The most recent image I posted that Dan provided a hint for, it's one I'm pretty sure you haven't read though you read the author's follow-up and didn't like it all that much, as I recall. :)

should we consideer this a clue? or are you answering and coming back with a photo? :)

i'm all for agreeing to disagree, rod. in fact, sometimes it's been suggested that we all agree far too much these days. i'd never have connected that portrait with ebenezer le page. :)
and i say this even if you love augustus caesar or the mists of avalon. of course, i'd think you were crazy, but who cares what i think? i'm just a girl on the internet. :)

"
yep! that helps! and it's the book of ebenezer le page! i've never seen that other cover, rod! for myself, i have to say i don't like it more than the nyrb. i like that the nyrb has an old weighted down man. it seems more appropriate to the subject matter, i mean, who is that supposed to be? ebenezer as a young man? raymond? if we were going to have ebenezer as a young man, looking like lord byron, i'd rather have him as a kid at the top of the greased pole. :)
in browsing through the covers on goodreads i think i actually like this italian edition cover best:

patty! that cover is almost tragic in its idiocy. i guess it's because it's pocket book era trickery when they tried to make classics "sexy"? :)

thanks for pointing out that there are other sites/sources to upload to, you guys. last i checked flickr had a 200 picture cut-off on free accounts, and i've already downloaded 20 pictures, so maybe that's not the best one. i don't think that it's specifically picasa that is stopping mike, however. :P
mike: i'm fine with dirty windows. how about dishes? :)

it's either laundry or posting your own photos, punk. :)
as patty points out, it's not as easy to do as you'd think. :)

heh. well, i'm happy to do this one for you, because you are an excellent egg, but let's not go crazy. i have a limited arsenal, and i can't use it all up helping other people who won't download picasa (or get some other uploading account). unless you plan on coming over and doing my laundry, and all the other chores i have to do. :)
here we go:


yes! that's right! are you going to post an image or do you want me to post another one?

c'mon! atlas shrugged battle!
rod gave you clues! c'mon americans! i didn't read any uncle sam books up here. i read the hockey sweater by roch carrier. :)

my lovely, i seek always for le mau/mot/mo juste, n'est-ce pas? :)


heh. remember when i first found out you had a classics background, dan, and i archly asked you how you felt about augustus? it's usually the first question i ask. :P
lord, how people can think that octavian and augustus are somehow two radically different beings in one body has always infuriated me. i remember my prof grinning away when i was the only one who hadn't bought the party line hook, line and sinker. actually, probably because i was sensitive to his personal intervention in getting ovid banished for "carmen et error".

actually, i think i'd have had an easier time with augustus -- i just had to stop playing and focus on other stuff last night but i'd recognize fakey-handsome statues of that bastard anywhere (what limited historical record he didn't control tells us that he wasn't actually handsome at all and had his statues faked up to make him more attractive than in life). i've been avoiding that book for some time now. :P
here follows another rant:
just read your review, rod, and i come from the opposite camp: my degree is english and classical studies (which included literature and history), and i specialized in roman history. i actually took a whole course on augustus, which included reading Res Gestae Divi Augusti, in English, "the Achievement of the Divine Augustus" which the emperor ostensibly penned himself. but the thing of it is, while augustus brought stability to the empire, most people agree it's because he lived long enough to do that after all the wars and proscriptions that preceded it. and as far as we can determine, he was the master of spin, made sure whatever documentation that was created was official and did not dispute his reign. he was supported in this effort by his friend maecenas. most scholars agree that it's really agrippa (on the military side) and maecenas (on the administrative side and propaganda man) that made it work. at one point, i thought of writing a novel from maecenas' and agrippa's point of views, and when i found out this one came out i was frustrated, convinced that augustus' most outstanding legacy was really his ability to change his name make people think he was great leader of men, and beautiful, to boot, long after he was dead.
here's a photo of his one of his fakey pretty statues i saw in rome in 2007 that i captioned
'augustus, my enemy'

disclaimer: for some reason the book cover game has revealed two things that make me rage more than anything else. i am not so truculent about everything! :)


i've loved this particular book since i was small because i stared at it (it was one of my sister's university textbooks) for two years before i finally took it and read it and loved it and claimed it (ie. stole it and refused to give it back to her). i buy people this particular edition when i find it in book stores because it's also my favourite translation. :)
this is a scan that was already in picasa of my original copy's beaten-up cover:

and in the meantime, one from my arsenal...
