Canavan’s
Comments
(group member since May 15, 2018)
Canavan’s
comments
from the Spells, Space & Screams: Collections & Anthologies in Fantasy, Science Fiction, & Horror group.
Showing 561-580 of 1,078

Although competently written, this one left quite the bad aftertaste. (view spoiler)
✭

I came away from this story with an acute sense of disappointment. I thought the setting and ideas Berliner initially presented to the reader were intriguing and (especially for this anthology) relatively unique, but I was ultimately confused as to precisely what the author was trying to tell us.
✭½

This is a vampire yarn of a sort...I suppose. Whatever it is, it’s fairly well written (especially for a first sale) and interesting. Paradoxically I found the initial (non-supernatural) part of the tale more absorbing; perhaps it’s because I once worked in environments like the one Hand describes and was acquainted with individuals like Helen who were similarly damaged.
✭✭✭½

Canavan, I think you nail it concerning rage. It fits noir story-telling to a degree -- think Mickey Spillane -- but while it reminded me I have Sunglasses..., it also made me wonder if I really want to read it.
Mickey Spillane — that’s a really good comparison.
I just looked through my bookshelves and find that I actually own a copy of Sunglasses After Dark . I didn’t think I did. Who knows, one day I may actually read it.

This is yet another story which features a recurring character, Sonja Blue. The Wikipedia article for the author provides a citation describing Sunglasses After Dark , which marked the first appearance of Sonja Blue, as “one of the most influential vampire novels published after 1970”. That may be so, but I wonder whether that is necessarily a good thing. (view spoiler)
✭✭

This was another story that was a bit of a miss for me. My reaction was prompted, I think, by the way in the author addressed her theme. (view spoiler)
✭✭½

Randy referred to this one in his post as fluff, and while that may be a fair characterization, if I’m being honest, this is nonetheless my favorite story in this anthology to this point. (view spoiler)
✭✭✭✭

Up to this point I'm finding the stories kind of light-weight which may be why I'm not anxious to dig in some more. Have to admit, I didn't expect that from what I've read of Jones' other anthologies.
Yeah, I’ve been a little underwhelmed to this point, which is a bit surprising since I typically find Stephen Jones a competent anthologist. I’ll keep plugging along, however; for one thing I nominated this book, so I feel a certain obligation to continue. And the stories may improve. And, of course, it goes without saying that just because I’ve found the first handful of stories a bit lacking, others will necessarily feel the same way.

I found this to be one of the better written pieces thus far encountered in the anthology, but I’m still fumbling around a bit trying to ascertain my reaction to it. (view spoiler)
✭✭✭½

I really disliked this one. It didn’t help that it’s part of a larger series (featuring Vicki Nelson, a vampire P.I.) that I’m completely unfamiliar with. Thus, Huff repeatedly tosses off vague references to prior events and relationships in a way I found increasingly annoying the further into the story I got. But I suspect that even had I been more familiar with these characters, I would have found the story just as dull. The writing struck me as flat and sometimes confusing, the characters came off as bland, and the plot was predictable and uninspired.
✭½

In his earlier stories in Wormwood: A Collection of Short Stories there was a tendency to romanticize male homosexuality -- and I don't mean that as a criticism; Wormwood is a terrific collection showing the progress in craft of a very good writer -- and I wonder if how "Homewrecker" fits in with that, if it does at all.
I wish I could say I had read all of that collection, but Brite is another of my many blind spots. I’ve read only three of those stories.

Let me say up front that I’ve never been a fan of Rice. I tried to read a few of her novels back in the 80s and only managed to complete her first one. I didn’t particularly hate Interview ; it was more that I found it puzzling.
(view spoiler)
✭✭

The intro to this anthology was penned by the late Ingrid Pitt. It falls into two parts, a relatively short, perfunctory (and frankly not very insightful) treatment of the literary vampire preceded by a lengthier, more informative resume of her acting career. She makes brief mention of her early work in more prestigious films, notably Where Eagles Dare, a 1968 WWII thriller based on an Alistair MacLean novel. Pitt will, however, always be best remembered for her appearance in a handful of horror films produced by Hammer Film in the early 70s, particularly the 1970 cult favorite, The Vampire Lovers, loosely based on the 1872 J. Sheridan Le Fanu novella “Carmilla”. Having quite recently attempted to re-watch some of these movies, I have to admit that, while they boast a small army of fans and admirers, I have never been one them one. Still, I found Pitt’s recollections of the filmmaking shenanigans fairly entertaining. Her account is characterized by an almost innocent insouciance that I found appealing (even when describing the frankly creepy behavior of some of the Hammer producers). Quite clearly it was a different era.

Nicolas Cage stars in an embarrassing rip off of Mortal Combat and Predator. Sigh, it does look like a fun movie you watch with friends, pizza, and shots.
I know I shouldn’t prejudge movies based solely on trailers, but, wow, this looks terrible.

I think the kamikaze fighting lead the US to consider extremes in dealing with Japan. Glad they passed on the carpet bombing, what was done was landmark enough.
Apologies for responding so late to this sub-thread. The take-away message seems to express the idea that the U.S. did not engage in large-scale bombing of Japan prior to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That’s not really the case. U.S. bombing of Japan started to greatly ramp up in November of 1944 with the availability of airbases in the Mariana Islands. Initially many of these missions were high-altitude, daylight raids aimed at knocking out Japanese industrial targets. For a number of reasons results were mixed. March of 1945 signaled a change in tactics as Curtis LeMay commenced the large-scale firebombing of major Japanese cities. The results were pretty ghastly and the morality of the attacks has been a topic of debate ever since. Casualty estimates (mostly civilian) resulting from the bombing campaign range from 241,000 to 900,000. After the war, LeMay expressed the opinion that if the U.S. had lost the conflict, he would probably have been tried as a war criminal.

I took a closer look at the ISFDB and see that you are indeed correct, Randy. There is a 2017 Skyhorse edition which, according to the notes, omits one story (i.e., “Outfangthief” by Conrad Williams under the pseudonym of Gala Blau) from earlier editions and includes two others (although the only one added that I can identify is the one you mentioned, “The North Stair” by Angela Slatter).
Stupid me, it did not immediately click as to why Skyhorse might have made this editorial change until I realized that, duh, Williams isn’t a woman.