Intelligent Design

Intelligent design (ID) is a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God, presented by its proponents as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins". Proponents claim that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." ID is a form of creationism that lacks empirical support and offers no testable or tenable hypotheses, so it is not science. The leading proponents of ID are associated with the Discovery Institute, a fundamentalist Christian and politically conservativ ...more

Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution
Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design
Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design
The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism
The Return of the God Hypothesis: Three Scientific Discoveries Revealing the Mind Behind the Universe
Darwin Devolves : The New Science About DNA That Challenges Evolution
The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery
Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuition That Life Is Designed
The Case for a Creator: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence That Points Toward God
The Design of Life: Discovering Signs of Intelligence in Biological Systems
The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design
Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science & Theology
The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief
Doubts about Darwin: A History of Intelligent Design
Catholicism and Evolution: A History from Darwin to Pope Francis

Michael Crichton
I would remind you to notice where the claim of consensus is invoked. Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough. Nobody says the consensus of scientists agrees that E=mc2. Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to anyone to speak that way.
Michael Crichton

Michael Crichton
I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're bei ...more
Michael Crichton

More quotes...
Underground Knowledge — A discussion group This global discussion group has been designed to encourage debates about important and underrep…more
24,345 members, last active 9 hours ago
Silent World — A discussion group A place to discuss all the unique aspects of Deaf culture as highlighted in the thriller Silent …more
1,557 members, last active 8 days ago
Championing Intelligent Design The purpose of this group is encourage a greater understanding of intelligent design. Recommend …more
5 members, last active 12 years ago