Megan’s answer to “Why is Peterson getting so much hate?” > Likes and Comments
92 likes · Like
I don't think so. I feel people are buying this book to help themselves hence not playing the victim card. Give them credit.
Lots of people don't read/ buy books before rating 1 star to try and discredit people unfortunately
Here is an answer that I found on Reddit. I think it covers most of it.
He is right wing which bothers left leaning keyboard warriors the wrong way immediately.
He tells people that they have the power to sort their own problems out, and that if they actually wanted a good life then they could make it happen, which forces the narcissists to have to admit that they’re not special little Wunderkind.
He gets lumped in with people like Andrew Tate which negatively affects the opinions of fence-sitters and those who would otherwise not know anything about him.
He was critical towards parts of the narrative surrounding trans people, which whipped the fanatics into a frenzy.
He speaks favourably of religion, particularly Christianity, but also other Abrahamic and Eastern religions. This angers fedora-tipping atheists who think they have everything figured out.
He speaks positively of Western civilisation as a whole, which rustles the jimmies of the people who take great pleasure in their self-hating anti-Western sentiments.
He is optimistic about the direction that humanity as a whole is heading, which conveniently allows the climate alarmists, recreational doomsayers, and boring nihilists alike to paint him as a clueless boomer.
People essentially just stalk his every online action and try their absolute hardest to make him look like a clown for Reddit points and gossip. If you view the profile of someone who shit-talks him, you’ll often find that that’s what they do all day, every day. It’s just losers who enjoy arguing and getting angry because they have nothing else in their life.
Aye, Victimhood is the new goldrush and Peterson's advising everyone it's fools gold.
Instead, he's promoting personal responsibility as the diamond in the rough.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Bernadette
(new)
Apr 25, 2020 10:50PM
I don't think so. I feel people are buying this book to help themselves hence not playing the victim card. Give them credit.
reply
|
flag
Lots of people don't read/ buy books before rating 1 star to try and discredit people unfortunately
Here is an answer that I found on Reddit. I think it covers most of it. He is right wing which bothers left leaning keyboard warriors the wrong way immediately.
He tells people that they have the power to sort their own problems out, and that if they actually wanted a good life then they could make it happen, which forces the narcissists to have to admit that they’re not special little Wunderkind.
He gets lumped in with people like Andrew Tate which negatively affects the opinions of fence-sitters and those who would otherwise not know anything about him.
He was critical towards parts of the narrative surrounding trans people, which whipped the fanatics into a frenzy.
He speaks favourably of religion, particularly Christianity, but also other Abrahamic and Eastern religions. This angers fedora-tipping atheists who think they have everything figured out.
He speaks positively of Western civilisation as a whole, which rustles the jimmies of the people who take great pleasure in their self-hating anti-Western sentiments.
He is optimistic about the direction that humanity as a whole is heading, which conveniently allows the climate alarmists, recreational doomsayers, and boring nihilists alike to paint him as a clueless boomer.
People essentially just stalk his every online action and try their absolute hardest to make him look like a clown for Reddit points and gossip. If you view the profile of someone who shit-talks him, you’ll often find that that’s what they do all day, every day. It’s just losers who enjoy arguing and getting angry because they have nothing else in their life.
Aye, Victimhood is the new goldrush and Peterson's advising everyone it's fools gold. Instead, he's promoting personal responsibility as the diamond in the rough.
