John’s answer to “This book is full of revisionist history and incorrect statements! I know it is fiction but so full…” > Likes and Comments
14 likes · Like
Well this does not say much. An example?
In my opinion it says nothing. The majority of people who make judgments about others in writing, do not offer proofs, If proofs existed, they would be proferred, in order to give support to the judgments. Left naked judgments are seen as irrational, and in my experience are irrational!
Unfortunately, they bias potential readers in a very underhanded way. It's almost like a Reagan fan club got in here and trolled this forum. Pathetic.
@Lidia...Or it could be that Follett did such an obviously ham-handed job of pushing a "liberal: good, conservative: bad" viewpoint in this work that it was unavoidably obvious to even many fans and long-time readers. At least one review on his website notes this problem https://ken-follett.com/bibliography/...
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Heikki
(new)
Mar 11, 2015 05:08PM
Well this does not say much. An example?
reply
|
flag
In my opinion it says nothing. The majority of people who make judgments about others in writing, do not offer proofs, If proofs existed, they would be proferred, in order to give support to the judgments. Left naked judgments are seen as irrational, and in my experience are irrational!
Unfortunately, they bias potential readers in a very underhanded way. It's almost like a Reagan fan club got in here and trolled this forum. Pathetic.
@Lidia...Or it could be that Follett did such an obviously ham-handed job of pushing a "liberal: good, conservative: bad" viewpoint in this work that it was unavoidably obvious to even many fans and long-time readers. At least one review on his website notes this problem https://ken-follett.com/bibliography/...
