Judith’s answer to “Moriarty inserts the pandemic into the final chapters of the book. Does that totally break the moo…” > Likes and Comments

3 likes · 
Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Teresa (new)

Teresa Bolster Actually it's about a mother who goes missing in the present, not 'entirely' flashbacks. . Would you say to the authors who wrote about living in London during the Blitz as it was happening that they shouldn't mention current events, because it's offensive as you said elsewhere ? That would be absurd. She dated it in the very first chapter with the catastrophic fires we experienced in Australia, we know Joy was missing for 21 days..what's the issue?


message 2: by Judith (new)

Judith This book is not of the historical fiction genre (unlike WWII era.) If you had read the other 45 answers/numerous comments, you would understand "the issue" & the opinions that have been discussed over the past 8 months.


message 3: by Teresa (new)

Teresa Bolster You misunderstand me. I'm talking about novels written in the early 40s contemporaneously such as Heat of the Day by Elizabeth Bowen.


message 4: by Judith (new)

Judith Getting too far off track here. The intent of this original question was discussion of how this book ended, see other 45 answers.


message 5: by Teresa (new)

Teresa Bolster It's entirely relevant because you said current events shouldn't be included in fiction. You said that. I'm rebutting. Just ignore all this if it annoys you.


message 6: by Judith (new)

Judith No, please re-read above: I said current events have nothing to do with anything in THIS particular story! I stand by that, & my last words are... to each his own.


back to top