carol. ’s review of The Stand > Likes and Comments
1475 likes · Like
love this
Thank you, Mark. I think I was inspired by all the diary entries by one of the leads--maybe I should have done it in that format.
Great stuff Carol. The Stand isn't one of my favorites either (and I felt almost obligated to round up to four stars, when it's really a 3.5 for me). I know a lot of King fans tout this as one of his masterpieces, but I think he's done much better elsewhere over the years (and there are at least 15 novels I would put before this one).
I also agree that it took him awhile to get the hang of writing convincing, three-dimensional women - Dolores Claiborne leading the pack, but I'm also a huge fan of Gerald's Game and (despite Annie Wilkes' homicidal tendencies) Misery.
I still want you to read The Long Walk!!!
Also, it's been awhile since I last read it, but are there zombies in The Stand? ;)
Oh, Trudi--you are such a librarian! ;) I will blame my shelving on being distracted by the books in the shelf above, or slippery keys, or some mysterious hacker rearranging my bookshelves.
I couldn't help but wonder when I was reading if the abridged version was a bit better? I like the world-building in general, but the characters here just felt one-dimensional. If I was feeling charitable, I might say archtypical, but I'm not, so I won't. I probably would have liked it more when I was younger, before all that awareness of feminism ruined my life. ;)
And I do have Long Walk on my to-read-sooner list!
Wonderful review! I've still not attempted to read a Stephen King book (not a great fan of the genre, to be honest).
lol Carol-it's funny on how much we agree on books! I didn't like this either, too convoluted. I was complaining about it to someone once and they suggested McCammon's Swan Song. Check it out if you haven't read it yet
Thank you Allie and Karla. King was my first (and virtually only) writer to flirt with horror, a genre he does well. Or at least better than this.
Maggie wrote: "lol Carol-it's funny on how much we agree on books! I didn't like this either, too convoluted. I was complaining about it to someone once and they suggested McCammon's Swan Song. Check it out if y..."
Maggie, I almost always add your 5-star books to my TBR list!
James wrote: "Poor Stephen..."
Oh, he's so over it. He moved on to domineering, creepy leg-breaking women.
Trudi wrote: "Carol wrote: "Oh, Trudi--you are such a librarian! ;) ..."
Oh Jesus, aren't I though? ;)"
It's okay. I like librarians. :) I'm admiring your attention to detail and organization.
Carol wrote: "It's okay. I like librarians. :) I'm admiring your attention to detail and organization."
That's such a nice way of putting it Carol, but I believe the DSM-IV refers to it as OCD :)
But I've made my peace with it. It's embedded on my DNA, I'm certain of it. Can't fight nature! But I promise it will come in handy when we take over the world! mwah-ha-ha
LOVE THIS. Bravo on one of the best reviews I've read! This put into words exactly how I felt about the Stand, especially the part about women. The one problem I had, that you didn't mention, was that SK seemed to write this with a thesaurus next to him. I consider myself to have a very wide vocabulary, and the number of words I had to look up (on my Kindle, so admittedly it was very easy) was incredibly annoying, and got to the point where it seemed insulting. Most of these words were words people would never use in conversation, and the characters in the book threw them out like they'd been saying them all their lives.
Tasha, thank you! I was looking forward to it as one of the apocalypse canons but found myself extremely disappointed by ALL the women characters.
Now that you say it, I think I had to look up a few words as well. Really, kind of a "look at me! I'm a writer!" book.
Rachel, I'm glad to hear you agree--there's such an enthusiastic audience for King, and he can write an interesting story, no doubt, but I'm not really impressed by his management of female characters. I certainly didn't feel guilty, just annoyed. ;)
Thank you so much. I am 70% through it and I am so annoyed with so much of it. I just read Nadine's seduction of Harold and I was cringing throughout. Really? Real women talk like this? No. And Fran is such a stupid character. Idiotic.
perfect review for the book. The walking dude was such a dissapointment too. You shat your pants if you just saw his face in your dreams but then he turned out to be a retard loving dude who's going retard himself in the end. So foolish
I usually love King but your review hit every one of my gripes spot on. Especially the women. Frannie Goldsmith is THE WORST female character he's ever written. I was honestly hoping she was dead by the time Stu got back. Haha. I did like Dana, but OF COURSE she has it out for men because she's kind of a lesbian. Nadine was also pretty but a total waste ultimately. Just not the work of genius I expected.
Great review. I read this back when I was around 13yrs and LOVED it. It was the first apocalypse-by-plague book I had read. So tragic and compelling! I do remember feeling the supernatural aspect of it being superfluous and a little ridiculous, but like you mentioned, I think the only reason I loved the book was because I was young.
I'm re-reading and having a hard time giving a rip about this book, now, at age 38. Boring and so UN-compelling!
Thank you, Shanah. I haven't gone back and read many of my favorites form younger years because I'm a little afraid of having that same experience!
I have a vested interest in King (a very good friend adores him), and he's done some decent work. But The Stand has me bored out of my mind.
I really wish I understood why people consider this a masterpiece, so I could at least grapple with it. But it seems every five star review here offers either a plot summary or a bland "SK is grreeeeat!"
You are spot on about King's female characters. This is something that's annoyed me in almost every book I've read by him, and one of the things that prevented The Stand from being the epic novel it could've been. Also, the cringey sex scenes. Like all a man has to do is look at a woman and she's coming on the spot. Nope!
You captured so much of my resistance to fall gangbusters in love with this one- a lot of it having to do with the baby as the holy grail.
Thank you, Mara! That means a lot from a King fan. I wonder if the abridged version is better? Which did you read?
Carol. [All cynic, all the time] wrote: "Thank you, Mara! That means a lot from a King fan. I wonder if the abridged version is better? Which did you read?"
Unabridged, and I'm super curious about unabridged as well!
Awesome review.Maybe If I read your review earlier,I would give up on reading this book.But now it's too late.I'm on page 748 and I'm really struggling to read to end.I already gave 3 stars and I can't give more.
Thanks, Veka. It's worth saying you've read it for the classic value, but I admit, I also skimmed toward the end when I had had my fill (and reading the Unabridged version didn't help).
I REALLY enjoyed your review. It perfectly expresses the vague annoyance I was feeling regarding the sexist and racist tones of this book. I love Stephen King and I have loved this book since I read it in middle school. I recently decided to read it again and now that I'm in my 30's, I actually pick up on these things. I still enjoyed the book, but I was wondering why Frannie went from being a decently developed character to being shoved to the background once the committee of men convened, as well as numerous other examples. I realized that a lot of his books have the hysterical/anxious/nagging woman. I'm hoping it was due to the time it was written (does that make it better? No, I guess not.) Either way, this was great and put into words what I was trying to convey to my friends who weren't reading the book and thus, did not care.
Thanks, Kristen. It's frustrating, isn't it, when you want to gripe about something and no one else knows what you are talking about. A good reason to join a book site, where at least other book people will understand!
That said, I agree, some of it is due to the time it was written--I think it is a reflection of what was a "normal" view. But I didn't read it way back to have a younger positive impression (during the days when I had underdeveloped humanist consciousness), so I had no qualms about skewering it now.
A very well written review! Do you do all of them in the form of a letter? I absolutely agree with all your positives and the negatives you mentioned got my Goat as well. Oh and also, did you know I can now go from Boston to Nebraska without a GPS?
Himanshu, thank you for your comment. This and one other are the only 'letter' formats I've used to date. I think the "journal" entries inspired me.
Congrats on being able to find your way around a highway system without a GPS! However did ancient Americans manage it?
I agree, particularly the whole apocalypse flu-scenario, the dark man and his evil empire; strange concepts but generally entertaining.
Wait, did you mean me?
back to top
message 1:
by
mark
(new)
Dec 28, 2011 12:35AM
love this
reply
|
flag
Thank you, Mark. I think I was inspired by all the diary entries by one of the leads--maybe I should have done it in that format.
Great stuff Carol. The Stand isn't one of my favorites either (and I felt almost obligated to round up to four stars, when it's really a 3.5 for me). I know a lot of King fans tout this as one of his masterpieces, but I think he's done much better elsewhere over the years (and there are at least 15 novels I would put before this one). I also agree that it took him awhile to get the hang of writing convincing, three-dimensional women - Dolores Claiborne leading the pack, but I'm also a huge fan of Gerald's Game and (despite Annie Wilkes' homicidal tendencies) Misery.
I still want you to read The Long Walk!!!
Also, it's been awhile since I last read it, but are there zombies in The Stand? ;)
Oh, Trudi--you are such a librarian! ;) I will blame my shelving on being distracted by the books in the shelf above, or slippery keys, or some mysterious hacker rearranging my bookshelves.I couldn't help but wonder when I was reading if the abridged version was a bit better? I like the world-building in general, but the characters here just felt one-dimensional. If I was feeling charitable, I might say archtypical, but I'm not, so I won't. I probably would have liked it more when I was younger, before all that awareness of feminism ruined my life. ;)
And I do have Long Walk on my to-read-sooner list!
Wonderful review! I've still not attempted to read a Stephen King book (not a great fan of the genre, to be honest).
Great review. This one was such a copout and the last in a string of bad luck with King. I gave up on him after this.
lol Carol-it's funny on how much we agree on books! I didn't like this either, too convoluted. I was complaining about it to someone once and they suggested McCammon's Swan Song. Check it out if you haven't read it yet
Thank you Allie and Karla. King was my first (and virtually only) writer to flirt with horror, a genre he does well. Or at least better than this.
Maggie wrote: "lol Carol-it's funny on how much we agree on books! I didn't like this either, too convoluted. I was complaining about it to someone once and they suggested McCammon's Swan Song. Check it out if y..."Maggie, I almost always add your 5-star books to my TBR list!
James wrote: "Poor Stephen..."Oh, he's so over it. He moved on to domineering, creepy leg-breaking women.
Trudi wrote: "Carol wrote: "Oh, Trudi--you are such a librarian! ;) ..."Oh Jesus, aren't I though? ;)"
It's okay. I like librarians. :) I'm admiring your attention to detail and organization.
Carol wrote: "It's okay. I like librarians. :) I'm admiring your attention to detail and organization."That's such a nice way of putting it Carol, but I believe the DSM-IV refers to it as OCD :)
But I've made my peace with it. It's embedded on my DNA, I'm certain of it. Can't fight nature! But I promise it will come in handy when we take over the world! mwah-ha-ha
LOVE THIS. Bravo on one of the best reviews I've read! This put into words exactly how I felt about the Stand, especially the part about women. The one problem I had, that you didn't mention, was that SK seemed to write this with a thesaurus next to him. I consider myself to have a very wide vocabulary, and the number of words I had to look up (on my Kindle, so admittedly it was very easy) was incredibly annoying, and got to the point where it seemed insulting. Most of these words were words people would never use in conversation, and the characters in the book threw them out like they'd been saying them all their lives.
Tasha, thank you! I was looking forward to it as one of the apocalypse canons but found myself extremely disappointed by ALL the women characters. Now that you say it, I think I had to look up a few words as well. Really, kind of a "look at me! I'm a writer!" book.
Rachel, I'm glad to hear you agree--there's such an enthusiastic audience for King, and he can write an interesting story, no doubt, but I'm not really impressed by his management of female characters. I certainly didn't feel guilty, just annoyed. ;)
Thank you so much. I am 70% through it and I am so annoyed with so much of it. I just read Nadine's seduction of Harold and I was cringing throughout. Really? Real women talk like this? No. And Fran is such a stupid character. Idiotic.
perfect review for the book. The walking dude was such a dissapointment too. You shat your pants if you just saw his face in your dreams but then he turned out to be a retard loving dude who's going retard himself in the end. So foolish
I usually love King but your review hit every one of my gripes spot on. Especially the women. Frannie Goldsmith is THE WORST female character he's ever written. I was honestly hoping she was dead by the time Stu got back. Haha. I did like Dana, but OF COURSE she has it out for men because she's kind of a lesbian. Nadine was also pretty but a total waste ultimately. Just not the work of genius I expected.
Great review. I read this back when I was around 13yrs and LOVED it. It was the first apocalypse-by-plague book I had read. So tragic and compelling! I do remember feeling the supernatural aspect of it being superfluous and a little ridiculous, but like you mentioned, I think the only reason I loved the book was because I was young.I'm re-reading and having a hard time giving a rip about this book, now, at age 38. Boring and so UN-compelling!
Thank you, Shanah. I haven't gone back and read many of my favorites form younger years because I'm a little afraid of having that same experience!
I have a vested interest in King (a very good friend adores him), and he's done some decent work. But The Stand has me bored out of my mind.I really wish I understood why people consider this a masterpiece, so I could at least grapple with it. But it seems every five star review here offers either a plot summary or a bland "SK is grreeeeat!"
You are spot on about King's female characters. This is something that's annoyed me in almost every book I've read by him, and one of the things that prevented The Stand from being the epic novel it could've been. Also, the cringey sex scenes. Like all a man has to do is look at a woman and she's coming on the spot. Nope!
You captured so much of my resistance to fall gangbusters in love with this one- a lot of it having to do with the baby as the holy grail.
Thank you, Mara! That means a lot from a King fan. I wonder if the abridged version is better? Which did you read?
Carol. [All cynic, all the time] wrote: "Thank you, Mara! That means a lot from a King fan. I wonder if the abridged version is better? Which did you read?"Unabridged, and I'm super curious about unabridged as well!
Awesome review.Maybe If I read your review earlier,I would give up on reading this book.But now it's too late.I'm on page 748 and I'm really struggling to read to end.I already gave 3 stars and I can't give more.
Thanks, Veka. It's worth saying you've read it for the classic value, but I admit, I also skimmed toward the end when I had had my fill (and reading the Unabridged version didn't help).
I REALLY enjoyed your review. It perfectly expresses the vague annoyance I was feeling regarding the sexist and racist tones of this book. I love Stephen King and I have loved this book since I read it in middle school. I recently decided to read it again and now that I'm in my 30's, I actually pick up on these things. I still enjoyed the book, but I was wondering why Frannie went from being a decently developed character to being shoved to the background once the committee of men convened, as well as numerous other examples. I realized that a lot of his books have the hysterical/anxious/nagging woman. I'm hoping it was due to the time it was written (does that make it better? No, I guess not.) Either way, this was great and put into words what I was trying to convey to my friends who weren't reading the book and thus, did not care.
Thanks, Kristen. It's frustrating, isn't it, when you want to gripe about something and no one else knows what you are talking about. A good reason to join a book site, where at least other book people will understand!That said, I agree, some of it is due to the time it was written--I think it is a reflection of what was a "normal" view. But I didn't read it way back to have a younger positive impression (during the days when I had underdeveloped humanist consciousness), so I had no qualms about skewering it now.
A very well written review! Do you do all of them in the form of a letter? I absolutely agree with all your positives and the negatives you mentioned got my Goat as well. Oh and also, did you know I can now go from Boston to Nebraska without a GPS?
Himanshu, thank you for your comment. This and one other are the only 'letter' formats I've used to date. I think the "journal" entries inspired me. Congrats on being able to find your way around a highway system without a GPS! However did ancient Americans manage it?
I agree, particularly the whole apocalypse flu-scenario, the dark man and his evil empire; strange concepts but generally entertaining.Wait, did you mean me?








