Are professional reviews useful? > Likes and Comments



I have used Booksprout where I gave away 20 ARCs of my book in exchange for a review. It's free to use, fairly straightforward, and out of the 20 books that got claimed, I got 12 reviews, so that's something :) You have to self-promote the hell out of it though to get the ARCs picked up.
I've submitted my book to another potential reviewer (it's a lesbian review site) but I'm not sure they'll choose to review due to certain content of my book. So I don't have high hopes; I can only try, lol.
Good luck!






In theory, professional reviewers should be people who know the particular genre inside out. I think they would be more helpful for someone writing within the usual genre boundaries than someone pushing those borders. And their reviews should be definitely written with more depth and in a factual tone (meaning no unrealistic praises or no fiery rants).
Whether they are better, that's hard to say. If you look at movies, you'll see that there can be a major difference between how a professional critic sees (and rates) a movie compared to a fan or to someone who's coming to the movie with no expectations or prior knowledge altogether. I'd say it's the same with book reviews.

You can try bloggers, especially those who are really interested in your particular genre.
I know your question was about books that are already published, but if you want to get detailed feedback on a book before you publish it, I have paid for a manuscript critique on a couple of my books from a professional editor and I found that incredibly useful. I learnt so much and I feel it has made my writing a lot stronger.

Like others I've used Literary Titan, twice in fact. One a non fiction, the other fiction.
Small fee, sound reviews, counts as an editorial review on Amazon rather than customer review.
Plus within the fee you are entitled to an author interview and other info.
I'll be using them for future work too.


This insures that not only are the reviews organic, they are honest considering you don't generally knoe the reader and the only contact is giving them a free copy.

The good news is that the Express Reviews on Reader's Favorite are less expensive than elsewhere ($50). The bad news is that it seems most people don't find them reputable, or value them much.
All in all, I think you need to weigh your responses here to figure out what works best for you.


As others have said, do what works for you.


What you have to look at is they reviews they have done. Are the good? Are they just a repeat of your blurb? is it generic? Did they even really ready the book?
If you get good reviews, that is great. If not, you won't use them again. I did get a couple of editorial reviews for two of my books. I will say that Kirkus was excellent, the others not so good, so there is a reason you pay that big money for them. I'd try to get a email list and then see if you can get a few from them when you publish the book.
Good luck and hope Voracious Readers works for you.



What is the name of the beta reading group? I searched but nothing came up. Thanks.

'Beta Reader Group'

I've used Voracious Readers Only for a few months now. It's given me a bunch of emails for my mailing list, and the owner is very reasonable to work with. Nothing but good to say there.
I received 1 nice Goodreads review from this, which I appreciated. I might have gotten 1 Amazon review. That's all though.




With that distinction in mind, if you're looking for critiquing to help improve and polish your story then I can recommend Critique Circle. Given the ban on links, feel free to message me for more details.


Editorial reviews are excellent, within the industry, but to the leyman, editorial information will wiz straight past many of them, an upfront honest review (not a blurb or re-hash of the story) of how the reader saw the book, I believe will create more sales than someone speaking industry language.
Also even though I know why you would want experienced reviewers, to me paying for it defeats the purpose, you need people who will speak their mind without worries of whether they are going to hurt an author's feelings.
Even I have had an author ask me why I rated her book 3 stars, and I find the scoring ratings crazy?? then she asked me if I could review ALL her book's. Work that out.



I wish people reading our books would review them. They get confused as to how to do so. Some don't want to go through the hassle of learning how to leave a review. They can give the review to you and you can leave it as a literary review with the reviewer's name.

Or they just don't care about reviews. Let readers do what readers do. If they want to review, they will. If not, don't sweat it.

T.J. Can I ask what kind of promotion you did on Booksprout to get the ARCs picked up?
The Booksprout site doesn't have any nuts and bolts on how it works for authors (not until after you've signed up, of course). I'm guessing the ARCs are ebooks and probably the most popular format would be Kindle compatible, yes?
up-date: after signing up, I'm still none the wiser on how to promote the ARC on Booksprout


You should ask for your money back. A review should never include a synopsis because once the browsing buyer has read a summary of your story, there's no reason left for them to read the book. A review should give them a feel for the writing style, the soul of the book and a mystery to dig deeper.

Generally, regular reviewers don't volunteer to beta-read because they would then have read a book that they cannot post a review about. The final version could be different, with improvements made and any flaws corrected, so to say anything they'd have to read the whole story again.

I haven't paid Kirkus for a review for precisely that reason. And it's not a one-off thing, that's their M.O. Look at the overwhelming majority of their reviews, and there's only about two or three sentences actually reviewing the book, the rest is basically a blurb. Huge waste of money in my opinion unless you have cash to burn and simply want the legitimacy of a Kirkus review.

Generic reviews for your book from actual readers is much better and they do get read. When I do read a book, I will review it be it good or bad. I don't give a synopsis unless its for a publication. That is the only time you need a short synopsis of the book. (which is where you can use that Kirkus review) I'm working on getting those reviews from people who actually read my book, be it good or bad. Any feedback means that I did get someone's attention.


Yes, please send link to the critique group you mentioned to teripizza@mail.com. Thank you for your definition of reviewers vs. beta readers.



Kirkus does have a certain prestige and good reviews can be used in ads. But the review itself won't do much. At least that
s my experience and my book was starred, featured, and made the list of one hundred best books--all without any increase in sales

Hi - I recently used IndieReader. Can't tell you if it will help me with sales, but it was a thoughtful review, they gave me a good rating at 3.5 (I think it's good at least, for them, as they aren't big in my romance genre) and there are pieces I can pull and post on my Amazon author page and BN review page. I like IndieReader and wanted my book listed on their pages.
I've used Booksprout and get good results from ARC readers, but for the most part the reviews aren't thoughtful...and I've found they have many reviewers who tend to just give a synopsis (which I kind of hate. Why would anyone buy the book after they know what's going to happen?). But, they definitely help to get your review numbers up.
AuthorsXP is another good service for ARCs (not paid for reviews... like Booksprout, these are those reviewing in exchange for a free copy).
I'm using Hidden Gem for my upcoming release... and so far they seem to be giving pretty thoughtful reviews. I look at ARCs in general as a necessary evil.....before ebooks, publishers gave out free paperback books by the boatload to get word of mouth. I see ARCs as today's lower cost version of free paperback giveaway, and a necessity since some look to see how many have reviewed your book.
Personally, I can't imagine Kirkus is worth the money, but I did buy from them when they were running a massive sale at Christmas. I still haven't received the review....but I did it because I wanted the feedback. And I am hoping, even though I'll get it after book release, there will be something useful in the review to use on my author page.
I love that you asked this question. It's so helpful to get feedback from authors about what's worked for them and what hasn't.


Since we're not allowed to "bash" reviews, I will just mention Kirkus made a BIG MISTAKE on dates, the whole purpose of the book about the date of Christ's birth found by using NASA astronomy programs.
The years of research had just been completed and published in my book. The reviewer said it should have been duplicated by a noted organization in the field. I never contacted the Vatican.
I doubt if anyone else has access to the original 68 NASA astronomy programs I used to find the data.
So, her only negative statement about finding confirming research was not well received. Perhaps she was used to reading fiction and didn't realize my book was reporting original research.
I tried to connect with Kirkus about the wrong data they published. I wrote emails, called and even sent a letter snail mail, to the CEO. One phone call resulted in a person who said they would pass the information on. Their information must have been ignored.
After weeks, I began to think very negative thoughts. When someone finally wrote back via one of my emails, after discussion, they responded by having the date in the review corrected.
I didn't address the original research aspect review comment as I figured they didn't realize the book printed recently completed original data which took several years of computer research. That was mentioned many times in the book.
Kirkus wrote in my contract that review buyers were to never print anything in the review without including the WHOLE review. Within the month and after, I saw bits of Kirkus reviews where people reported, when asked by me, that they were informed they could publish sections of their review if the whole review was cited. Therefore, there were two standards represented by that organization for using the reviews as publicity.
For the price, as you can see, I was disappointed.
First, as mentioned earlier, by their negligence in numbers.
Second , not being able to contact anyone in a suitable time frame to have the incorrect data corrected to match that published in the book.
Who reads a review twice? A month is a long time to have incorrect data of original research posted.
After that, I haven't paid for another review. I was soured on the experience.
Bestsellers World
Indie Reader
Readers' Favorite (This one gives free reviews)
Does anyone here have experience with any of these or others? I'm willing to pay for thorough reviews, but I'll definitely give Readers' Favorite a chance.