Suzy’s comment > Likes and Comments
Like
At the end of the day, Jeremiah is a teenaged boy. He's not an angel, he's meant to be a boy. Just a boy. And what do boys do? They screw you over. I feel like if he was just perfect and continued being so wonderful, it would make his character a bit unrealistic. It was a mistake, something he did that he cannot justify, and that is what makes him so real. What I love about Jenny Han is how real and relatable her characters are. I really believe in them. And what you have to remember is that the cheating does not define Jere. I think people look at what he did and then kind of forget everything about him from the first two books. His kindness, his open-heartedness, his affection and loyalty and love is all still there, that doesn't just go away. He's still Jere!
I really liked them both but I say Conrad. He's just better any almost every way.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Davina
(new)
Aug 20, 2013 07:39AM
At the end of the day, Jeremiah is a teenaged boy. He's not an angel, he's meant to be a boy. Just a boy. And what do boys do? They screw you over. I feel like if he was just perfect and continued being so wonderful, it would make his character a bit unrealistic. It was a mistake, something he did that he cannot justify, and that is what makes him so real. What I love about Jenny Han is how real and relatable her characters are. I really believe in them. And what you have to remember is that the cheating does not define Jere. I think people look at what he did and then kind of forget everything about him from the first two books. His kindness, his open-heartedness, his affection and loyalty and love is all still there, that doesn't just go away. He's still Jere!
reply
|
flag
I really liked them both but I say Conrad. He's just better any almost every way.
