What Makes You Put Down a Book?
Comments Showing 351-400 of 993 (993 new)
message 351:
by
Katy
(new)
Jul 09, 2013 02:14PM

flag





I knew that I had started a book and never finished it. I blocked the book's name from my memory. However, you have reminded me. It was Bleak House!

I've also found that a lot of books on the Oprah Book Club list are books that make the reader suffer. You can have a character go through lots of pain without making the reader feel like crap. It's true! You can! Lately, reading some of these popular books is like walking onto a rake with the tynes up, and getting smacked in the face. Repeatedly.

Jodi wrote: "I usually try to finish everything, no matter how much I dislike it. However, I recently came very, very, very close to abandoning Kate Atkinson's "Life After Life". Not only did the story move at..."
Funny...I could not put that book down ("Life After Life")...I dreamed about it when I wasn't reading it.



Also abandoned Catch 22 pretty early on...






I also abandoned..."
Abandoned Eat, Pray, Love, after reading Eat and Pray sections; saw the movie and finished Love section. No regrets.

Personally there are only a handful of books that I've given up on and like others have said sometimes it's down to timing rather than the book itself that makes me put it down.






The writing was just dry and I could find no story to latch on to. I've decided to make next year a re-read year so I'm going to try it again. If I don't make it through this time I'm giving up on it.


I managed to finish "The English Patient," but I hated it. I agree that Lonesome Dove stars very slowly, but is worth finishing.

You should ask what books people have finished but wished they hadn't. Wicked and The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo would both be on that list for me.
If I cannot connect with a book, either through plot or character, then there is no point torturing myself. I used to plod on hoping things would change. Now, I can usually crack open a book at the store, and know within a few pages if I am interested. Some books can grab my attention from the first page.

i just could NOT get through Death with Interruptions by Saramago. it seemed, to me, to be one long rambling paragraph.

How far along are you with "Kevin?" It gets much better in the second half of book...much better.

Once of twice the reason have been that I've had to return the book to the library, never to really pick it up again.

I don't think I ever abandoned a book. I don't consider that a good thing though. I can't help myself it seems.

You should ask what books people have finished but wished t..."
That would be Gone, Girl for me; what a waste of time!
The story had no redeeming value, and the characters were twisted.

Audiobooks are now mainstream entertainment. I know that I probably would've have ditched The Grapes of Wrath in printed form, but the audiobook was fantastic!
If you abandoned the Harry Potter series, try listening to Jim Dale's award-winning rendition of these books instead.
One of the best reasons to pick up an audiobook is because you can read even MORE books. Yes, you can still say you read the book even if you heard it.
Cordially,
Karen Commins,, audiobook narrator
My audiobooks on Audible.com





You are so right -- I read partly for escape, and because I want to be in a different place, not necessarily a horrible place. It's nice if it's a pleasant place, but it at least needs to be INTERESTING for some reason. And I have to like something about it. I managed to read the first Hunger Games, but when I started the second, I decided I really didn't want to go back there.

I'm so surprised to see so much hate and so many people giving up on The Casual Vacancy. I got it as a present a few months back and just started reading it and am 1/3 the way through and think it's excellent. Rowling's character portrayals are so realistic and relatable, and I don't get why people are unable to see that. She used very similar characterizations for her Harry Potter characters.
Other than Casual Vacancy, I've finished all of them except for Fifty Shades of Grey and Eat, Pray, Love. All of the others on this list (including the 'classics'), I finished because I either really enjoyed the book or found the book interesting for its cultural and historical significance.
I have absolutely no interest in reading Fifty Shades of Grey or Eat, Pray, Love. I have read enough of the reviews and heard the hype, and I already know I would hate them. That doesn't make them bad books, but everyone has different tastes.

One of the things I appreciate about the Amazon listings is that you can read the first few pages of a book. I figure that way I can get a sense of whether the writer can write, if they are writing about anything interesting to me, etc. I love good lead-ins to story, good hooks, as it were, and think that's a high art. If an author can pull me in right away, usually that's a good sign that the book will be good. If not ... it may still be good, but I may have to work harder, which is not necessarily a bad thing, but not always worth it. And, of course, there are certain things up with which I will not put.





Ah, well, but if it's good enough, it can get re-read. I do that with my favorites. There are books I've read dozens of times, and some only 4 or 5 times. Re-reads are a particular genre with me.

I usually don't like unfinished books but sometimes i just can't stand it and think that maybe the book wasn't really meant during this period of time. I of course return again to the book and finish it.
I usually put the book down when I'm at the beginning or something but if i have like 100 pages or 200 pages left i will finish it
(: