Goodreads Blog

How Authors Can Engage with Readers and Reviewers on Goodreads

Posted by Cynthia on April 9, 2018
Goodreads is the world’s largest site for readers and book recommendations, and an attractive spot for authors to promote their books to readers to get reviews. Authors sometimes wonder how to effectively reach and engage with reviewers on Goodreads, especially when they can see how much Goodreads reviews can impact the success of a book.

There are two different approaches for authors when it comes to promoting books on Goodreads that authors should leverage together. There’s the “pure marketing” approach, for which Goodreads provides suite of advertising products for authors to use to build awareness around their books. The other approach involves investing in building long term relationships with readers that can pay off over time.

If you have the time and are willing to invest it, here are some ways to engage with reviewers on Goodreads:

Share your passion for books. The number one activity readers want to see from authors on Goodreads is the books they read and recommend. People go to Goodreads to talk about books, and authors who embrace this unlock the power to effectively integrate Goodreads into their overall online presence.

Successful authors like Celeste Ng and Roxane Gay spent years curating their shelves on Goodreads while concurrently writing their books. The authors have more than 500 books marked as ‘read’ and Ng even created custom shelves to give a better sense of what she’s reading.

Adding a few books to your WTR shelf once a week or updating the status of the book you just finished is all it takes to stay engaged with the Goodreads community. You might choose to take a more strategic approach: review books that are in the same genre as the book you have written, create shelves of books you used for inspiration, or mark books that you loved in high school.

Build genuine relationships. When browsing the reviews of the books you love, you’ll find readers who share your preferences. It might be tempting to shoot them a quick message to introduce yourself and your book, but there’s the risk that the message might be perceived as spam. Instead, follow the reviewer and see what books you both enjoyed, see their reviews and updates in your newsfeed, and then engage with them in the comment section of those reviews and updates. Engage with the reviewer over a shared passion for reading. Remember: relationships take time to cultivate so don’t give up if you don’t see immediate results.

Know when to mention your book. There are many areas where authors can talk about their own book, and guess what? Your book page is one of them. Reviewing your own book is allowed as long as it’s clear that the work you’re reviewing is your own. Approach the review space of your own book like you would writing a foreword, adding additional insights that didn’t make it into the blurb (see an example here) and sharing occasional updates.

While you’re on the book page, avoid responding to reviews about your own book. Even if you like a particularly positive review of your own book, resist the urge to hit ‘like’ on Goodreads. Instead, follow the reviewer to see what else the person might be reading (hey - if they liked your book, you already know they have great taste!) and start engaging with them about books you both enjoyed.

Let reviewers contact you. Ask the Author allows authors to take questions from readers anywhere in the world, at any time. The questions aren’t public until the author chooses to answer them, and it’s perfectly fine to skip questions. Check your Author Dashboard for new questions regularly and tell readers to ask you questions using Ask the Author by sharing the link to your Goodreads profile on your website, newsletter, blog, or social media account.

You can talk about your book through Ask the Author – in fact, we encourage it by asking “Where did you get your idea for your most recent book?” – but you can use it in many other creative ways as well: share some original writing or personal insights on yourself. Have a friend ask you a question that you can respond to, or even ask yourself a question!

Readers might occasionally send you a message telling you how much they loved your book, and if you feel comfortable engaging with readers that way, go for it. If they request for a free copy of your book, feel free to send them a copy, but don’t feel obligated to accommodate that if your budget doesn’t allow for it. A friendly decline “I’m out of review copies at the moment, but you can follow me for updates on when I get more” can work.

When authors take this long-term approach and invest in building a community on Goodreads, they find their time spent on Goodreads becomes much richer.

How do you engage with readers? Tell us in the comments below!

Next: The Business of Being a Writer: Turning Attention Into Sales

You might also like: Five Things Writers Need to Know Before Publishing Their First Book

Goodreads Authors can subscribe to the Monthly Author Newsletter by editing their account settings. Not a Goodreads Author yet? Learn about the Goodreads Author Program here.




Comments Showing 51-86 of 86 (86 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 51: by Fiona (new)

Fiona Tarr Evelyn wrote: "Thanks Rebecca, I think you have found the right balance - it was the 'promotional' stunt aspect that's been worrying me.

Thanks for the tip about videos."


I think if you agree with the average review, its worth adding that many starts. My first book averages 4 stars. I agree with that. It was my first book, so I have put a star rating on it. The rest I have not as the average is close to 5 stars and that feels a little pretentious.


message 52: by Y.M. (new)

Y.M. Nelson Evelyn wrote: "This is the second time I’ve seen advice to review one’s own books, perhaps there are others too. There are many sites and individuals who review for a fee and I think that’s a complete no-go. Cert..."

A lot of people still say no on this.


message 53: by John (new)

John Rabe I have had the same experience of so-called reviewers winning books. Of 89 given away last September, I have had 4 reviews. When I checked the profiles of some of the recipients I found that one had over 11,000 and another 4,000 books to read. It is disturbing to hear that some on-sell them! I have often wondered in the past why 2nd hand copies of my book are reflected as for sale when my original sales haven't reflected such sales.


message 54: by Evelyn (last edited Apr 20, 2018 01:18AM) (new)

Evelyn Wood Stephen wrote: "Yikes! Just checked my last print giveaway. One winner with almost 19k books to read and another with 4k. Not good! ."

Same point from John. Must say these huge numbers of books that would take most a lifetime, or two if they are normal, to read ought to be a red flag for GR - Of course maybe they are all world champion speed readers!!

Having run one paid giveaway I can only report that I see no difference in the result or any effort by GR to improve the position. I guess the truth is that as a sub of Amazon it's grist to their corporate mill. I enjoy GR and the interactions on forums, but seriously doubt its value in marketing.


message 55: by Evelyn (new)

Evelyn Wood Stephen wrote: "Evelyn wrote: "Stephen wrote: "Yikes! Just checked my last print giveaway. One winner with almost 19k books to read and another with 4k. Not good! ."

Just signed up for your newsletter - great web site:
If you have never read this you might find it amusing:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/a...


message 56: by Randi (new)

Randi Samuelson-Brown I'd say the article was scary!! I took a look at the people who hd my book on their "to read" list. I believe one had 45,000 - yep, that's right. 45 thousand. Better to be with the people that have five or ten (single digits). Sheesh. What an eye-opener!


message 57: by John (new)

John Rabe Randi wrote: "I'd say the article was scary!! I took a look at the people who hd my book on their "to read" list. I believe one had 45,000 - yep, that's right. 45 thousand. Better to be with the people that have..."
Well it certainly was a shock to me.


message 58: by Randall (new)

Randall Moore Surprising it was even published. My BS meter was nearly off the chart.


message 59: by John (new)

John Rabe I guess we are on to a hiding to nothing!


message 60: by Gene (new)

Gene Morton Evelyn, started this discussion, expressing his concerns about paying for a review. I've shared some of those concerns. Then one day, a professional in the publishing world helped me gain a new perspective on author paying for reviews. Of course, the author/self-publisher has to pay for the review out of their own pocket: $200 to $400.
Publisher's Weekly publishes reviews. Publishers may pay thousands of dollars for ads in the magazine several times in a year and probably are on a first name basis with the editorial staff in New York.
An author wishing to have unpaid book reviews, can ask her or his colleagues for independent reviews, or pay the price of admission and buy a paid review. It might be justified if it is considered advertising.
Instead of an author's review, what I would like from an author is a very short account of why and how they came to write their book. What kind of adventure they had when tackling their topic. These accounts help me to get to know her or him better. So Evelyn, tell us your story. I'll read that before I read a review, anyway. And thanks for bringing up the topic.


message 61: by John (new)

John Rabe My main interest in this topic is the fact that Goodreads hand books out to 'readers' who already have thousand of books to read on their shelves.


message 62: by Khristina (new)

Khristina Chess Sheesh - I'd never thought to ask myself a question on my Author Profile. I'm going to give that one a try. With previous Goodreads giveaways, I received a handful of good reviews from the effort, but not enough to justify the new cost model, so that's no longer an option.


message 63: by [deleted user] (new)

Rebecca wrote: "I've put "reviews" on most of my books to show the date upon which they were published, but as a personal rule I don't apply a star rating to my own books because it seems sort of like a promotiona..."

TOTALLY AGREE. People get put-off if we leave "star" reviews on our own work.

Chris


message 64: by Vivienne (new)

Vivienne Shannon Fascinating discussion about self-promotion. I absolutely hate the whole idea and feel of it. Finding doing it a million times harder than just writing the book (and that took me five years!). Going right back to the original comment about reviewing one's own book - how on earth is that even possible? Obviously I just want to give myself five stars and tell everyone how super-amazing it is, with a big sign saying BUY ME NOW! lol. Not sure that's the idea at all!!


message 65: by Gene (new)

Gene Morton Vivienne wrote:
"Fascinating discussion about self-promotion. I absolutely hate the whole idea and feel of it. Finding doing it a million times harder than just writing the book (and that took me five years!)."
What I find much more interesting is an author's self-review, an author's story about how she or he came to write the book, and what the author was thinking about or motivated by at the time of writing selected "stand out" passages; the author's favorites.
Gene


message 66: by Vivienne (new)

Vivienne Shannon Kate wrote: "It's called something like TBC (THE Facebook Book Club) but I don't think it shows up in searches. Another author got me in - can't remember how."

It's a private site and you can only be invited to join if someone else puts you up for membership (my sister got me in). A really good, vibrant community, very lively.


message 67: by Vivienne (new)

Vivienne Shannon Having followed this extremely interesting and relevant thread I have taken the good advice and gone and added a little infoview (not a review, not information, but somewhere between the two) to my book page. Quite fun to write and, I hope, engaging for potential readers but without being too pushy. (I was taking my cue from Gene's post, above). I've put on there that people can ask me questions, as well, which seems a lot more user-friendly and enjoyable than doing a great 'sell'.


message 68: by Gene (new)

Gene Morton Vivienne wrote: "Having followed this extremely interesting and relevant thread I have taken the good advice and gone and added a little infoview (not a review, not information, but somewhere between the two) to my..."

Great idea.
Gene


message 69: by A (last edited May 23, 2018 03:26PM) (new)

A K'Ory I've never reviewed my own books and I don't feel right doing that. You can't expect a parent to see the ugliness or shortcomings of their baby - they can't. I do write rather unique romance, especially in my Golden Shana series, where I wanted something with erotic in it but very different from the millions out there.

The result is that I had two reviewers who didn't read the books to the end - they expected the nice, neat copycat stuff - which is definitely not what I write. So I decided to warn potential reviewers with the following:

Do you know what ©DOMRISTOCRAT IS?
OR A ©SUBRISTOCRAT? HOW ABOUT
©SOPHISTEROTICA? A P VON K’ORY writes
them as opposed to the ©McErotica that abounds
by the kajillions. Be selective ©Sophisterotic
& discerning reader. Grab ©Sophisterotica
by A P von K’Ory

So far this has brought me reviews from two fellow authors: Lisabet Sarai and Alanza DeRose. And they loved my books and can't wait for me to finish the third book in the series. But you will agree that two reviewers, as valuable as they are to me, are hardly a ripple in the waters.


message 70: by Michael (new)

Michael D'Agostino I think these "help" articles are an attempt to regain indie author interest in Goodreads, which has fallen since the giveaway changes. The whole thing could collapse if indie authors pull away and they just become another tool/advertising venue for NY publishers.


message 71: by K.S. (new)

K.S. Trenten Thank you for the advice! At first I was a little shy about writing reviews. Now I’m starting to really enjoy sharing some of my obsessiveness through some of my old literary loves along with the new. ☺️


message 72: by حذيفة (new)

حذيفة Thank you


message 73: by Gentle (new)

Gentle Thank you Robert Zwilling for the frank but very helpful advice. I just joined the community today.


message 74: by Samsulhadi (new)

Samsulhadi Saya masih pemula dan masih butuh banyak belajar dari para master.


message 75: by Karen (new)

Karen Levine My Book is a NONFICTION CRIME STORY A GREAT READ AVAILABLE ON AMAZON AND B&N ...ALSO IN KINDLE FORMAT....www.thelevineproject.com


message 76: by Karen (new)

Karen Levine "THE LEVINE PROJECT " A HARROWING UNBELIEVABLE TRUE STORY...


message 77: by Susan (new)

Susan Cronk I "like" the reviews, good and bad. I like engaging with my readers. I thank them for their feedback because it helps me grow as a writer and I want them to know I value their comments, even if they aren't all positive. I try never to ignore my readers. They're the reason I write.

Karl wrote: ""if you like a particularly positive review of your own book, resist the urge to hit ‘like’ on Goodreads"

That goes against what some reviewers say. I've heard that some reviewers like to know tha..."



message 78: by Susan (new)

Susan Cronk I've done a few giveaways and enjoy sending off the books. There have been a few reviews. But, if I specifically want reviews I'll send them off to a list of beta readers I had. Hey, most of them had "reviewer training" in middle school. That's why the English teachers made us all write book reports, so we could learn to post reviews online now! Prescient of them, wasn't it?

Kate wrote: "Karl wrote: "My experience of giveaways (print) was the same. Some users create multiple accounts and just enter each giveaway a lot of times. High chance of winning when they enter them all, then ..."


message 79: by Chiara (new)

Chiara As a writer and author, I do post reviews on books I read. I think it is important to share the review with the writer who has spent hours and hours on writing a story. I will do reviews for other authors regardless of genre (except Erotia or Horror). However, when I ask another author if we can swap books for reviews, they decline and say they don't read the type of writing I do. Well, I believe all writers should read as much as they can. It is how one improves their writing craft. I've done Giveaways and Free Book contests. I hardly ever see reviews. If I got a free book, I'd read it and review it too. People don't do that anymore. It's frustrating.


message 80: by Susan (new)

Susan Cronk I am glad you take the time to do reviews. I try to always write a review, even a brief one, on the books I read, whether for reading for enjoyment or for research purposes. What sometimes gets overlooked is that one of the conditions of the Goodreads giveaways is that reviews are not required of the recipient nor may they be requested. The Giveaway is just that, a giveaway, expecting nothing in return. I am concerned however, as other authors may be, that the trend may be that some folks are just signing up for them to get books to resell and that they are not actually reading the books they receive, but merely building inventory. I don't think that's happened in my case, but it is a concern. If authors were permitted to inscribe the books to the recipient with a personalized note, that might end the issue, but I don't think autographed books are permitted either. I haven't done a giveaway for a while. I would have to go back and reread the rules again.

Chiara wrote: "As a writer and author, I do post reviews on books I read. I think it is important to share the review with the writer who has spent hours and hours on writing a story. I will do reviews for other ..."


message 81: by Susan (new)

Susan Cronk I made that same mistake. I was reviewing two books, one softcover and one audiobook. I wrote the reviews back to back. Didn't realize that in editing I had inadvertently cut and pasted a comment about one into the review of another. I eventually went back and corrected my online copy but unfortunately I had sent the review off to the publisher who sent me the book. That stopped me from trying to work on multiple reviews at the same time.

Karl wrote: "Occasionally reviewers make mistakes - adding the review to the wrong book, or reviewing a book based on things that are nothing to do with a book (e.g. the rating is really a rating for Amazon and..."


message 82: by Mehmet (new)

Mehmet Yildiz As a new member, I enjoyed reading this article. It is really helpful with great advice.


message 83: by Roslyn (new)

Roslyn Reid I think readers would be skeptical of us reviewing our own books. Are we going to hate our writing? Of course not!


message 84: by Sherlene (new)

Sherlene Stroud I am not any good with computers and had a hard time uploading my books . For some reason Good Reads would not take them without a rating. So I had to rate them, not that I wanted to but because I had to. Still don't like the idea of rating my own books.


message 85: by Roslyn (new)

Roslyn Reid I agree. But since computers run our lives, we gotta do what our overlords demand. *chuckle*


message 86: by Boiporitto (new)

Boiporitto Authors are valueless without readers. Everybody know this. But how to engage readers to authors - this fact many of us don't know.
Thanks so much for the detail of the engaging tips. Reading books is lessening day by day.


« previous 1 2 next »
back to top