Two queens with nothing in common

Still catching up with historical posts….and cursing the snow.
On February 13, 1177, Henry and Eleanor’s youngest daughter, Joanna, was wed in Palermo to William, the King of Sicily and then crowned as his consort. She was all of eleven years old. It is hard for us to imagine sending children off to foreign lands to marry strangers at such young ages, but this was the way of life for the highborn in the MA. Surely some parents must have felt some qualms, though, for the safety or wellbeing of their daughters. Some of these marriages were happy ones; Joanna’s older sister Leonora came to love her husband, the King of Castile. Some were not as successful and some brought only misery to the young brides; surely the worst case was that of Agnes, daughter of Louis VII of France, sent off to wed the son of the Byzantine emperor at age eight; her young husband would be murdered and she would be forced to wed his killer, a man whose reign was so brutal that the citizens of Constantinople rose up against him and he fled the city with his favorite concubine and his little French bride. He was later captured and died rather gruesomely, but Agnes was spared.
Joanna encountered no such horrors in Sicily and was well treated by her husband, although he did keep a harem of Saracen slave girls. She would be widowed young, imprisoned by the man who usurped her husband’s throne, and then rescued by her brother Richard and accompanied him on crusade. Here is the account by Roger de Hoveden of Joanna’s introduction to her new life in Sicily. It had been a rough trip for her; she’d been escorted into Poitou by her eldest brother Hal, and then Richard escorted her all the way to St Gilles, where she was turned over to the Sicilian envoys. On the voyage, she’d suffered so severely from seasickness that the fleet had to hand at Naples and continue on land. But she was given a magnificent welcome into Palermo.
“The whole city welcomed them, and lamps, so many and so large, were lighted up, that the city almost seemed to be on fire…for it was by night that they entered the city of Palermo. The said daughter of the King of England was then escorted, mounted on one of the king’s horses, and resplendent with regal garments, to a certain palace, that there she might in becoming state await the day of her marriage and coronation.
After the expiration of a few days, the before-named daughter of the King of England was married to William, King of Sicily, and solemnly crowned at Palermo, in the royal chapel there, in the presence of Gilles, Bishop of Evreux and the envoys of the King of England.”
That same day William issued a charter in Joanna’s favor, providing generously for her dowry, describing her as “the maiden Joanna, of royal blood, and the most illustrious daughter of Henry, the mighty king of the English, to the end that her fidelity and chaste affection may produce the blessings of the married state.”

And on February 13, 1542, silly little Catherine Howard became yet another victim of her husband’s monstrous ego. When Henry VIII discovered that she’d had a colorful past prior to their marriage, he was so outraged that he pushed a bill of attainder through Parliament making it treason for an “unchaste” woman to marry the king, then sent Catherine to the Tower, where she was beheaded on this date. In the past, we’ve talked of Jane Grey, who paid with her life for her family’s all-consuming ambition. So did Catherine Howard, although she had none of Jane’s intelligence or education, which makes her pathetic story all the sadder. Marriage to the aging, ailing, hot-tempered Henry was more than punishment enough for any sins of her feckless youth. Despite the legend, though, she did not say that she died the Queen of England but would rather have died the wife of Thomas Culpepper. Those about to be executed in Tudor England did not make defiant gallows speeches, wanting to spare their family from royal retribution. But Catherine really did ask for the block to be brought to her the night before her execution; she wanted to practice kneeling and putting her head upon it so she would be sure to do it correctly come the morning. How pitiful is that?
18 likes ·   •  10 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 15, 2016 10:38
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Gary (last edited Feb 15, 2016 12:34PM) (new)

Gary Katherine Howard's story was indeed a very tragic one
Katherine Howard had a forgiving nature and always ready to believe the best of people.
I believe that Katherine Howard,, had a loving heart which was why she loved more than one man

Ultimately her past of having had several lovers before she married Henry was used to depose and murder the unfortunate girl. How far have we come from this double standard today whereby the more sexual adventures a man had the greater a hero he was while a girl or lady was demonized for having ever been sexually adventurous Id say this double standard still is strong today'
The best historical novel I have read on Katherine Howard is Murder Most Royal by Jean Plaidy


message 2: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I definitely agree about the double-standard, Gary, though it is quite as blatant as in the past. I always thought of Katherine Howard as a minnow thrown in to swim with sharks, with predictable results. Her family members were vultures.


message 3: by Terelyn (new)

Terelyn Marks Poor little Katherine Howard. She was apparently a sweet, but not terribly bright young thing. She loved the idea of being queen with the clothes and jewels, but was that really worth marrying Henry? Not that she really had a lot of choice when he decided he wanted her.

The double standard is still going strong -- a woman may not be executed for a 'colorful' past, but she's still labeled a slut or worse.

One does have to wonder -- how are these 'stud' men supposed to have their sexual adventures, if the women are all supposed to be pure and chaste?


message 4: by Sharon (new)

Sharon LOL, Terelyn. An excellent question! I agree with you that Catherine Howard does not sound as if she were all that bright; she was certainly poorly educated. And of course she had no say in the matter. None of Henry's wives did.


message 5: by F. (new)

F. Glenn Very interesting bit of history. I can't seem to get enough of these stories. I would like to read more about Catherine Howard.


message 6: by Gary (new)

Gary F. I heartily reccomend Murder Most Royal by Jean Plaidy for a compassionate and sympathetic portral of both Ann Boleyn and Katherine Howard
It is better than anything by Phillippa Gregory


message 7: by F. (new)

F. Glenn Thank you so much Gary. I will certainly look for that book and add it to my list. Thanks again.


message 8: by RJay (new)

RJay Sharon-
Your history reminders are most welcome. Royal brides, or "peace cows" as Bernard Cornwell's Uhtred calls them, were sacrificed for mens' political aims. Women still aren't equal but we've sure come along way since then, at least in the Western world.


message 9: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca I think the Duke of Norfolk has a lot to answer for when it comes to poor little Catherine Howard who married a monster & a tyrant, she was used to further the Howard family fortunes & Catherine paid a terrible price.

Also didn't Thomas Howard betray his own son to save his life? That man would've sold his own mother if it had profited him...I could be wrong in this, as I'm going from memory.....


message 10: by Terelyn (new)

Terelyn Marks Gary wrote: "F. I heartily reccomend Murder Most Royal by Jean Plaidy for a compassionate and sympathetic portral of both Ann Boleyn and Katherine Howard
It is better than anything by Phillippa Gregory"


Excellent book!


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.