How many of these books have you read?

This article is a bit silly — I mean, the title is actually “What Ivy-League Students are Reading That You Aren’t”, which strikes me as, well, silly. I mean, does the author — Christopher Ingraham — mean that “we” aren’t reading those books NOW? Because whether or not we read them in college, there’s no special reason to expect us to be reading them again right this minute, is there?


Also, when he looks at “all books assigned,” he includes . . . textbooks! Like Campbell’s BIOLOGY. That’s *really* silly.


But I like this one bit where the article checks out the books that are most assigned in actual English classes. Here Ingraham compares the books most assigned overall to the ones most assigned by the Ivies. That’s at least mildly interesting, don’t you think? So here:


All Schools:


Frankenstein

Canterbury Tales

Paradise Lost

Heart of Darkness

Hamlet

The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock

The Yellow Wallpaper

Young Goodman Brown

The Awakening

Oedipus


That actually strikes me as a pretty good list! I don’t think “The Yellow Wallpaper” is a novel, though. Isn’t that a short story? Creepy? A woman is going insane? Pretty sure I’m remembering the right story.


Interestingly, I’ve read (at least parts of) everything above The Love Song of J. AP. Below that, only “The Yellow Wallpaper.” I’ve never even heard of Young Goodman Brown.


Overall, though, I’d say this list is reassuring considering we keep hearing that today’s college freshmen are reading on something like the seventh grade level.


To compare, here’s the list from the Ivies:


Canterbury Tales

Paradise Lost

Persuasion

The Faerie Queen

Hamlet

The Spanish Trilogy

Heart of Darkness

Jude the Obscure

Twelfth Night

Frankenstein


Persuasion! That’s good to see. The non-Ivy students are missing out if they never read Austen. And the Ivies get to read a comedy as well as a tragedy, lucky them. Still, reasonable overlap, I’d say. Again it seems peculiar to include one of these works — “The Spanish Trilogy” is a poem, not a novel — I mean, a relatively short poem, not like The Faerie Queen or whatever — so I really don’t think the criteria for these lists were sufficiently strict.


Although I’m pretty sure I’ve read Frankenstein, I’m almost totally sure it wasn’t assigned in school. Did any of you have Frankenstein actually assigned?


I’ve read eight works from those two lists combined, which is about half of the fifteen works total.


I’d never heard of three of these works: Young Goodman Brown, The Awakening, and the Spanish Trilogy.


I actually enjoyed three of these works: The Canterbury Tales (we only read bits of this), Persuasion, and Twelfth Night.


I loathed one of these: Heart of Darkness.


How about you, these lists spark any fond or loathsome memories?


1 like ·   •  5 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 11, 2016 11:20
Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Sherwood (new)

Sherwood Smith I've read them all. Frankenstein was not on any lists when I was young. Just as well, considering how books were taught when I was in high school and college (white male dictated Meanings and Themes about sums it up).

It's actually a pretty crappy novel, but it's fascinating for its time, and of course the history of its coming about. I hated Heart of Darkness then, and still do. I just don't think it's very good, but it seems to hit contemporary male viewpoint amidships.

I wonder what the thinking is behind Jude the Obscure. Maybe because it's extra depressing even for Hardy?


message 2: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier I didn't think much of Frankenstein at the time, but if I read it now I think I would find it more interesting because of the context.

No doubt you're right about Jude the Obscure! Nothing like *crushing the students* under the weight of dark, depressing, grim stories. Now I'm grateful that one wasn't assigned to me.


message 3: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier And I don't remember much about Heart of Darkness, probably because I hated it so much I blocked it. But now I'm tempted to go read bits of it with your comment in mind.

Except, no, ugh, probably not.


message 4: by Sherwood (new)

Sherwood Smith Yeah, it's trenchantly male gaze and deterministic, and while it seems to be inveighing against the whites' imperialistic pushes into Africa, it manages to depict black people as savages. I think the best one can say for it is that it depicts the dark side of being a human being, but I maintain we only have to listen to an hour of the news for that, and don't need to suffer through reading that book. (Of course mileage varies!)


message 5: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier The dark side of being human! These days I don't think it takes an hour of news to figure that out.

That reminds me of Morpheus telling the Corinthian something like, "You reminded them that there are bad people out there. And they knew that already."


back to top