Why We Love Damaged and Tortured Characters

What is it about damaged heroes that attract women readers, and writers? Damaged and tortured heroes and heroines, either emotionally or physically, are a staple in literature: Hamlet, Quasimodo, or Heathcliff. Maxim de Winter in Rebecca. In film, give an actor or actress the role of a handicapped or emotionally challenged character and you can almost be sure an Academy Award will follow. The Three Faces of Eve, My Left Foot, The Theory of Everything, A Beautiful Mind, Charlie. Even children’s books have damaged characters: The Secret Garden, Beauty and the Beast. How about theater’s award winning Phantom of the Opera? Those are but a few of the examples. The list goes on and on.

My critique partner says that I make heroes out of damaged characters. I never thought of it that way, but I went over my bibliography, and she’s right. My stories are full of damaged characters, both emotionally and physically. I’ve written eleven books, eight suspense novels under my name and three erotic romances written under a pseudonym. Out of the eleven novels, nine have damaged heroes/heroines. The two that don’t are the second and third books in my series, but that’s only because the main characters’ histories are explained in book one. No sense beating a dead horse.

All villains are messed up, but in my book, Mind Games, the villain is almost sympathetic, even though he’s evil to the core. It’s much easier to write a pure villain with no redeeming qualities than it is to make him understood, in that weird villainous way.

Not only do I write damaged heroes, I read them. The most interesting, in my opinion, is Will Trent, Karin Slaughter’s series character. Because he’s dyslexic and wired differently—he literally can’t read―he uses other methods to piece together the clues in a crime that “normal” cops don’t see. He’s socially inept, almost backward, but that’s because he had a Dickensian childhood. I root for him. I want him to succeed. More about that later.

I have a character like Trent in my book Threads, written long before Will Trent came on the scene but published long after. I worked on it for years, but one character remained true, and that was Garrett. What a mess, but I fell in love with him. I’ve fallen in love with all my heroes. If I don’t, I can’t write them.

My book Murder Déjà Vu may have my favorite damaged hero. Architect Reece Daughtry spent fifteen years in prison for a murder he didn’t commit and was released when his lawyer proved he was convicted on tainted evidence. Fifteen years in prison has left him with a form of PTSD. He has a terrible fear of being confined. Even the house he builds has skylights in every room, so he can “see the clouds and stars and know the universe exists.”

There’s Luke McCallister in InSight, a deaf cop forced into counseling with Abby Gallant, a psychologist blinded by her ex-husband’s failed attempt to kill her. Now there’s an interesting coupling.

Abby isn’t my only damaged female character. I believe in gender equality. There’s retired call girl Tawny Dell in Hooked. She can’t fall in love, so she does her job and goes home to an empty loft. A little messed up? Ya think? Then she meets the cop who might send her to jail if she doesn’t do a job for the NYPD. Bet you can guess what happens. Oh, he has a history too, of course. Lincoln Walsh, is a cop who discovered his mother’s suicide, which left him a ward of the state.

So what’s the fascination with damaged characters? I might be a little close to the situation to answer, but I think it’s because readers want to root for a character, whether male or female, to beat the odds, to win, to come out of their shells, or take the first step. To find love because they never experienced it or because they were so badly hurt by someone they shunned the very people who could give them what they don’t know they need. As readers and as writers, we want to care about the people in our stories because they become real to us. From the time we create them to the time we type, THE END, we live with them, become them, and feel them.

Of course, the real answer why we’re fascinated by flawed and tortured characters might be that normal is boring. But don’t tell anyone I said that.
4 likes ·   •  12 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 21, 2016 16:30
Comments Showing 1-12 of 12 (12 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Elaine (new)

Elaine Orr Very thought provoking. I was especially intrigued by, "There’s Luke McCallister in InSight, a deaf cop forced into counseling with Abby Gallant, a psychologist blinded by her ex-husband’s failed attempt to kill her."

Thanks for sharing.
Elaine


message 2: by Polly (new)

Polly Elaine wrote: "Very thought provoking. I was especially intrigued by, "There’s Luke McCallister in InSight, a deaf cop forced into counseling with Abby Gallant, a psychologist blinded by her ex-husband’s failed a..."

Thanks for commenting, Elaine. Can't get much more tortured than those two. And the husband killed their daughter. Oh, my.


message 3: by D.V. (new)

D.V. Berkom LOL "Normal is boring". Yep--you hit the nail on the head :-)


message 4: by Polly (new)

Polly D.V. wrote: "LOL "Normal is boring". Yep--you hit the nail on the head :-)"

I have a feeling no one would ever describe either of us as "normal." I hope not anyway.


message 5: by D.V. (new)

D.V. Berkom Polly wrote: "D.V. wrote: "LOL "Normal is boring". Yep--you hit the nail on the head :-)"

I have a feeling no one would ever describe either of us as "normal." I hope not anyway."


Nah. Not likely.


message 6: by Claire (new)

Claire Having read most of your books, Polly, I concur with your assessment. As a reader and writer, I want your characters to succeed. Maybe that's why the short story I'm working on right now has a main character who may be a serial killer. It's fascinating to try to be in his head and let the reader learn what makes him tick.


message 7: by Polly (new)

Polly Claire wrote: "Having read most of your books, Polly, I concur with your assessment. As a reader and writer, I want your characters to succeed. Maybe that's why the short story I'm working on right now has a main..."

I think being in the heads of your characters is the key, Claire. It's really a mind transference. You are no longer you. Once you do that, you can feel what they feel, think how they're thinking. If you have that ability, your readers will commiserate with your character and root for him/her. Even in the case of a serial killer, the reader should understand his reasoning, twisted as he may be. The killer in Mind Games was a real challenge to me, because he was seriously screwed up, but I wanted the reader to have empathy for him. Same with the bad guy in Backlash. I felt sorry for both of them. Thanks for commenting.


message 8: by Danielle (new)

Danielle Dahl Would the need to nurture, latent in each of us, be the answer?
D.


message 9: by Polly (new)

Polly Danielle wrote: "Would the need to nurture, latent in each of us, be the answer?
D."


I'm sure that accounts for some women. It's much better on the written page than in real life. Why is that?


message 10: by Danielle (new)

Danielle Dahl Perhaps because nurturing is expected from women, therefore not worth noting in real life. D.


message 11: by Cher'ley (new)

Cher'ley Grogg My hero is emotionally stunted. Because of the life he was dealt, he never did much as a teen or a young man, but things changed after his mother died. I guess it gives us a chance to help that person. Cher'ley


message 12: by Polly (new)

Polly Cher'ley wrote: "My hero is emotionally stunted. Because of the life he was dealt, he never did much as a teen or a young man, but things changed after his mother died. I guess it gives us a chance to help that per..."

That's a very good theory. I must say, in real life, I'm not very nurturing, so maybe I get it out on the written page.


back to top