Getting Book Reviews and Odious Comparisons

elephant butte 5 cropA rare sight of Elephant Butte with snow, from the Christmas storm in New Mexico. We caught this on the drive home from Tucson, and now that I’ve turned in THE EDGE OF THE BLADE, I’m digging photos out of my camera and sharing. Yay!


The last few days, I’ve been in a range of conversations with writers at various stages of their careers.


One friend is not yet published. She had been discouraged by a string of rejections and has resolved to take her series out via self-publishing this year. (It’s a contemporary romance series that I think is excellent and will be excited to tell you all about when she’s ready.) We’ll also strategize another series for her to query with traditional publishing. For her, everything is about cracking that first barrier – getting her first book out there. 


On one of my author loops, several extensively published authors bemoaned not being able to get book reviews. One commented that her latest self-published release got zero reviews. On another loop, more published authors complained of the same, asking for tips on getting more reviews.


Meanwhile another author friend yesterday celebrated the one-year anniversary of the publication of her book – and that it just hit 1,000 reviews on Amazon.


Me? I fall somewhere in the middle of all of this. I get a substantial number of reviews, from wonderful, enthusiastic readers – but I got nothing like 1,000.


So, what did we learn today, boys and girls?


There’s a saying that hearkens back to the fourteenth century, credited to John Fortesque, that’s been repeated by many, such as Lydgate, Shakespeare and Swift.


Comparisons are odious.


And no, that has nothing to do with odor. The word “odious” comes from the Latin odium for hatred. Something that is odious is hateful, disgusting or offensive.


In other words… DON’T DO IT.


Don’t make comparisons, people. And I’m speaking to myself, too, because when my darling friend announced hitting 1,000 Amazon reviews, the first thing I did was go look at my comparable book. How many? 54 Amazon reviews.


But hey, it’s better than zero reviews.


And it’s better than not having a book published yet.


Actually… it is what it is, right? Comparisons are odious because they’re meaningless. I reminded myself of that, shrugged it off, and closed the Amazon page.


We all do what we can do.

 •  1 comment  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 12, 2016 10:54
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jeannie (new)

Jeannie Zelos Sometimes it's the old "self fulfilling prophecy" at work. More reviews on amazon mean getting in the top 100 lists, and then of course more eyes are on it and more people buying/reviewing. I love paranormal romance, esp vampires and shifters, but the amazon top 100 in most of the different lists they have contain the Bella Forest Shade Of xyz books. I read the first on Kindle Unlimited and its not for me, but trying to find different books when each search churns out more of these novels gets dull, and I give up. Just searched romance, vampires and the first 20 had only 5 books not by BF. Good for her for selling well, but it does mean that her books, because they're in front of people, get sold, reviewed, and stay at the top. There's lots pf the "fluffy furries " type to, and in fact very few of the books I've read and reviewed that IMO deserve to be there. Unless I search specific book titles or authors its hard to find books that I've loved in a random search, so it'll be the same for other would be buyers. Unless ( as with art) the work is there in front of them its got no chance of being bought. Sadly, apart from contacting reviewers direct etc I'm not sure what else authors can do. There's murmurings too that giveaways and book tours are being classed as reward by amazon and reviews deleted, I've rarely done either but now don't intend to take the risk. I like getting ARCs too much to want to lose my amazon rating and get reviews deleted.

I used to belong to an art website where the most popular pics were listed weekly. Of course the first 10 or so, especially the first 3 got looked at first and thus the positions didn't change. People would get really hung up on visitor numbers, when it's sales we needed.


back to top