TRUE RELATIVITY

Relativity in
three-dimensional space holds a surprise when the first two primal atoms of
matter and antimatter are split out of part zero with a relative coordinate
movement that is both linear and rotational (true of any two objects when alone
in a Universe). The instinct of a modern physicist at this moment is to start
calculating, a mistake that has landed fundamental physics in a rut. What is
shown to us at this bare moment is a glimpse of true relativity.

One question cannot be
answered; which of the two atoms is moving away. Is one atom moving away while
the other remains at standstill. There is no way to tell. From the vantage
point of either atom (for an observer in our minds eye), the question of relative
rotation cannot be answered either. From one atom, the other appears to be orbiting
but from that atom, the other may simply be seen to rotate on its axis (with
any relevant blend of these two observations).

Without a third
independent observation point, there is no way to tell. But another observation
point cannot change the situation except by making it more complicated. There will
never be any way to tell.

Distance and time are being
shown to us in their simplest elegant form as a relation, the division of one non-corporeal
concept into another. Atom radius can be used to measure an increasing distance
between two atoms. This gives us a measure of distance. One atom
rotation can be used as a benchmark to measure time by how many rotations it
takes to reach any given distance at the linear speed.

The mathematics of time
and distance exists solely in our minds. The mathematical model for space-time
continuum where time has the role of a fourth dimension may be useful as long
as you realize that it is not reality. It would be far better to build a
mathematical model based on true relativity.