With ENCODE Results, Evolutionary Biologists Are Forced to Wait in Perplexity

Editor's note: This is Part 5 of a 6-part series on ENCODE that Casey Luskin has been publishing this year in Salvo Magazine. Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 have already been published there. The prelude can be found here.

As we recently saw, some evolutionary scientists have responded to ENCODE by attempting to rewrite history and claim that evolutionary science predicted function for non-coding DNA all along. Other evolutionists handle ENCODE's results in a more candid manner. Instead of rewriting h...