Did You Know Whether Creationism is Science?
This is not an odd question simply because evolutionists are constantly attacking the Bible as unscientific. But just because they attack it doesn't make creation true or untrue.
Here’s the question for everyone to consider: do creationist's claim creationism to be fact or theory?
Once again the answer is obvious to those not blinded by the lies of evolution. Creationists admit that they cannot scientifically prove creation, so it is a theory! Now I call such honesty refreshing.
In a previous article about evolution I referred to predictions. In other words, can it predict the events we know took place? In examining the Evolutionary Model we found that no real meaningful predictions were made and in fact billions of years are constantly being added.
In the case of creation it has been demonstrated by scientists that certain events known to have occurred in history were predictable within the Creation Module. One example is the splitting up of the original super-continent, believed by both evolutionists and creationists to have existed, into seven continents was predictable. Not necessarily the number of new continents but the fact of the split. Evolutionists had to admit that some unknown cataclysm occurred millions of years ago, while creationists merely pointed to the Flood.
Another interesting fact is that the very laws of science that cause problems for evolution actually agree with creationism.
So is creationism a scientific fact? Not scientifically? It cannot be proven and, therefore, must be considered a theory. Unlike evolution, scientists have attempted to test certain aspects of creation and to a certain degree have been able to establish credibility.
In the end, creation is a theory that you must accept or reject based on belief. But it is a theory that is both credible and predictable. As new scientific facts are discovered, this theory does not require major changes in time or any other element to adjust to the new facts. The new facts simply become a part of the whole story.
Is creation science? You decide, but I think it is a credible scientific theory!
Oh, and by the way, an increasing number of scientists, not necessarily Christian or even religious, are turning to Creationism as the only scientifically acceptable theory of origins.
Evolutionists control the media, the classroom, and the courthouse, but they cannot stop the growth of Creationism!
It is impossible to give credit to all the sources responsible for the information contained in this article. However, the information for this article has been gleaned from several sources including Institute for Creation Research, Answers in Genesis, Wikipedia, and my own research.
Here’s the question for everyone to consider: do creationist's claim creationism to be fact or theory?
Once again the answer is obvious to those not blinded by the lies of evolution. Creationists admit that they cannot scientifically prove creation, so it is a theory! Now I call such honesty refreshing.
In a previous article about evolution I referred to predictions. In other words, can it predict the events we know took place? In examining the Evolutionary Model we found that no real meaningful predictions were made and in fact billions of years are constantly being added.
In the case of creation it has been demonstrated by scientists that certain events known to have occurred in history were predictable within the Creation Module. One example is the splitting up of the original super-continent, believed by both evolutionists and creationists to have existed, into seven continents was predictable. Not necessarily the number of new continents but the fact of the split. Evolutionists had to admit that some unknown cataclysm occurred millions of years ago, while creationists merely pointed to the Flood.
Another interesting fact is that the very laws of science that cause problems for evolution actually agree with creationism.
So is creationism a scientific fact? Not scientifically? It cannot be proven and, therefore, must be considered a theory. Unlike evolution, scientists have attempted to test certain aspects of creation and to a certain degree have been able to establish credibility.
In the end, creation is a theory that you must accept or reject based on belief. But it is a theory that is both credible and predictable. As new scientific facts are discovered, this theory does not require major changes in time or any other element to adjust to the new facts. The new facts simply become a part of the whole story.
Is creation science? You decide, but I think it is a credible scientific theory!
Oh, and by the way, an increasing number of scientists, not necessarily Christian or even religious, are turning to Creationism as the only scientifically acceptable theory of origins.
Evolutionists control the media, the classroom, and the courthouse, but they cannot stop the growth of Creationism!
It is impossible to give credit to all the sources responsible for the information contained in this article. However, the information for this article has been gleaned from several sources including Institute for Creation Research, Answers in Genesis, Wikipedia, and my own research.
No comments have been added yet.
