Two Critics of Intelligent Design Prefer Darwin's Path as a Science Thinker; We Can Identify

One of the criticisms you hear about intelligent design is that ID advocates analyze ideas rather than doing research in a lab. (I'm phrasing that in a polite way.) While ID scientists do indeed perform experimental research, it's true that weighing explanations for the origin of biological information is a sine qua non, and that need not be done at a lab bench. In the case for ID, reasoning is the key.

So it's interesting to read candid admissions from two scientists bitterly opposed to ID...