Why Can't Intelligent Design Critics in Synthese Accurately Represent Their Opponents?

The most recent issue of Synthese contains a variety of condescending articles against intelligent design (ID). But a few articles do attempt to make actual critiques of ID. The problem is that they don't accurately represent the actual arguments of ID proponents. Can't these top-rate philosophers rebut ID without misrepresenting the arguments?

The article by Niall Shanks and Keith Green repeatedly misrepresent intelligent design as appealing to "divine agency." It's all based on a ...