“Two scientific journals accepted a study by Maggie Simpson and Edna Krabappel”

    People who know nothing about Interpreter’s peer review process routinely and confidently announce, on the basis of nothing, that it has none.   This, though, is the kind of thing that happens at journals that genuinely don’t have a peer review process:   http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/sp...   It’s not the kind of thing that’s likely [Read More...]