Over the past week I've been writing about the latest iteration of the Darwinian response to Michael Behe's argument for intelligent design based on what Dr. Behe calls irreducible complexity. I use the word "iteration" not in the sense of our seeing something new, but in the sense that it's another round of the same unworkable objections that we've seen before.
Behe's case for ID goes back nearly twenty years now, yet the objections to it have not evolved much in that time. I have been loo...
Published on July 22, 2015 03:56