Julian Asswanker Should Be Shot

What is it with Julian Asswanker and so-called "liberals" (as opposed to actual liberals, now an endangered species)? This whole situation embodies idiocy, bigotry and frothing hatred, with none of the benefits that actual, real liberalism espouses.



First, Julian claims to be doing this because he hates "Bastards." We must be clear here, though: He's done little expose of the Russians, none of the Chinese, North Koreans, Vietnamese, Iranians, Zimbabweans, or any other group of "bastards." Mostly, he's attacking the US. Remember that US? The one that gives food to half the world, sends entire fleets of ships to clean up after earthquakes in Haiti, tsunamis in Indonesia, that US? The "Bastards."



Here's a hint from Speaker to Morons: Compared to any of those other countries, the US is the good guy.



In other words, he's picking on us because we have a relatively open society that makes it possible.



So basically, he's an inept loser of a spy and a moral coward.



The check on this is that after the sole Russian document release, they openly offered to put a hit on him if there was another. There has not been another.



Now, as it stands, every government on Earth wants him silenced, for good and valid reasons I'll go into below, and even Reporters Without Borders is calling on him to exercise some discretion, because his rampant idiocy is making it harder for real journalists to get any information. Rather than improving visibility, he's causing people to clam up. This is contradictory to his stated case. So, either he's a total idiot, or he's a self-aggrandizing cockbag playing libtards for fools. Considering how easy the latter is, I think we have a winner.



Now, here is why the government, and every rational person in America, should be calling for his blood, slowly and painfully.



You might have noticed when you got up this morning that the US government was still there. Not only was it still there, it was still operating much as it did yesterday, last week, last month, last year. Asswanker's attack on "bastards" has been pathetically, amusingly, embarrassingly ineffective.



What did happen, when this release started, was that all my friends in Intel and Operations got called in, away from their families (yes, government employees and contractors are actual human beings with actual families. Some of them even have actual degrees in stuff other than liberal arts), to work long hours on your tax dollars (for some reason, they expect to be paid for work they do. I know, I know. Outrageous of them. Blame their right-wing unions).



What, you ask, are they doing with those long hours?



Well, you see, it turns out that intel in the war against the Taliban (that you liberals bitched about for half the Clinton administration, which did nothing about it), and the excesses of Saddam Hussein (who you complained about until we attacked him, then turned him into some kind of underdog folk hero), came from actual, real people with families and lives. Yes, information generally comes from persons living in the area. Imagine that.



The public release of this information amid much fanfare means the enemy that was informed upon knows the names of the informants. This means those informants, and their families, are at risk of being killed, raped, tortured, or otherwise harmed by an enemy that thinks cutting off of noses, stoning to death and rape are acceptable activities.



I presume these are the "Bastards" that Asswanker and yourselves hate, right?



Right?



So, yes, actual, real people, who bravely stepped up against local terror and butchery are having to evacuate their homes and be relocated to live in fear, on your tax dollars (unless you'd prefer we leave them to be killed, raped, butchered by the heroic, anti-American Taliban and al Qaida).



So, I presume from the responses I see from Asswanker's cheerleaders, that this is exactly what they want



Legitimate journalists redact personal and identifying information, so the story still gets told, but no one gets compromised. That's apparently not good enough for Asswanker (incidentally, in the spirit of openness, may I assume he's going to post the last decade of his emails for people to view? Soon? Yes?). He has to, as Jon Stewart put it, show their penis. I mean, how do you know someone's really male if you don't see their penis?



So, Asswanker has, in the name of hating "Bastards":



Done nothing about human rights abuses in China, North Korea, Vietnam, Zimbabwe or other places.



Caused people who fear vicious regimes and terrorists to go underground and stop giving intel.



Caused possible informants everywhere to stop talking to reporters.



Cost the American taxpayers a lot of money to hide the victims of this debacle.



Compromised ongoing operations against these parties.



Done nothing that substantially hurts the US government as a political entity.



Congratulations. You're all a bunch of putrid little scumbags.



PS: Asswanker is under arrest for possible rape in Sweden. Now, this case is very non-American in structure, and he may be guilty or innocent. That is why there is to be a trial.



I must confess, though, I'm very surprised by some of the comments I'm hearing about the trial. I know that rape and women's issues are big items for liberals, and I believe they should be for conservatives, too. I think they generally are, just expressed differently.



Apparently, one story is that he saw one of the women twice, and may have had sex with her while she was asleep. That would be nonconsensual. (It's also pretty lame and unmanly, but this IS Asswanker.)



I'm a bit at a loss as to how supporters of his, anti-government and presumably "liberal," can justify this as "if she saw him twice it was obviously consensual." Really? Once having seen a man, a woman is never allowed to say no? And there were also comments of "Obviously she enjoyed it if she went back for more. What did she expect?"



This sounds awfully like, "She was asking for it," and "She should be flattered by the attention" and "What kind of bitch says no?"



Are you really sure you're a liberal? Because I'm friends with quite a few liberals, and they don't sound like that.



And I hope he's shot in the base of the skull with a 9mm Makarov, then heaved into a dumpster somewhere, pour encourager les autres.




Read more