With their so-called "march for marriage" happening only days before the US Supreme Court hears the most critical marriage cases in which the anti-LGBT movement will be tasked with denying that personal animus toward homosexuality is what guides their resistance to civil marriage parity, the National Organization For Marriage should want to book march speakers who do not have clear records of personal hostility toward what they see as "lifestyles" and "behaviors." But instead they booked Jim...
Published on April 21, 2015 11:06