What does Veil of Roses" mean? heck if I know!

Most common question I'm asked: "What does the title Veil of Roses mean?"

My answer: I have no idea! It doesn't mean anything, really. When I sold the novel, I sold it under the title, First Comes Marriage, because it's a play on that childhood rhyme that opens the novel. First comes love, then comes marriage, etc. But the publisher thought that title was too romance-y and wanted something that was more literary. They came up with a bunch of title ideas, and I did, too, but after lots of back & forth, the verdict came down: We are calling it A Veil of Sky and Roses.

I was like, huh? What does that even mean? I never did get a good answer for that, and I was really stressed out because a. it made no sense, and b. the people I told it to couldn't ever remember it. I'd give the title, and three minutes later they'd say, "What's it called again? A Veil of Sky and What?"

Ultimately, the publisher wants a title that's memorable and so was willing to shorten it to Veil of Roses. I considered that such a victory that I let go the fact that it still made no sense. Then, when I wrote the sequel, I put a little poem-y sort of thing right at the beginning which I hoped *gave* some meaning to what was before completely meaningless:

I did it, Maman.
I am here, now.
I have found a way to stay.
I have even found love.
I was married by Elvis Presley
At the Chapel of the Blue Suede Shoes
In the City of Sin.
If you'd been here, Maman,
I would have been married in my sister's home.
You would have washed my hair with your lavender soap
And laced flowers in my hair,
making for me a veil of roses.
Go, you said. Go and wake up your luck.
But what about you?
At last, Maman––what about you?
Come, I say to you now.
Come, Maman Joon.
Come, and wake up your luck.

What do you think? Does it mean something now? I don't know. It seemed like a good idea at the time!

More questions? Ask away!
Love, Laura
 •  4 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 27, 2015 16:53 Tags: dreaming-in-english, sequel, titles, veil-of-roses
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Diana (new)

Diana I don't have a question, but a comment. Naming your novel "Veil of Roses" was what caught my eye in the bookstore. That is what caused me to pick up the book, then I was intrigued with the picture on the front and then the description on the back. After realizing it was a book about a Persian girl, I had to buy it. My first serious boyfriend was Persian and I have had a fascination with Persian culture ever since. Anyway, I think I have purchased all of your books since then. I am a fan!


message 2: by Laura (new)

Laura Diana wrote: "I don't have a question, but a comment. Naming your novel "Veil of Roses" was what caught my eye in the bookstore. That is what caused me to pick up the book, then I was intrigued with the picture ..."

Thanks, Diana! I know - for some reason, the title did work and was intriguing enough to get people to pick up the book. It just didn't have a real meaning! Glad to connect with a fan! I've got a new novel coming out in May, called Lost In America. It's different than anything I've ever written - my version of a thriller.


message 3: by Diana (new)

Diana I'm certainly looking forward to your version of a thriller. I'm sure I'll love it!


message 4: by Laura (new)

Laura Diana wrote: "I'm certainly looking forward to your version of a thriller. I'm sure I'll love it!"

Thanks, Diana! I hope you do!


back to top

Not-Too-Deep Thoughts by Laura Fitzgerald

Laura Fitzgerald
I'm locked alone in my office, writing...and sometimes I feel more like talking to people - so have a listen, if you will! ...more
Follow Laura Fitzgerald's blog with rss.