A great deal of discussion has been devoted to needless contrasting of science versus religion, as if the two were in competition, which they are not. The juxtaposition is now long outdated and adhered to only by the least informed who pronounce on the subject (Dawkins of course comes to mind here but there are many others). I'd like to pose a different question: What about history versus science?
I am just completing famed historian John Lukacs's interesting little book, The Future of Histo...
Published on February 28, 2015 06:39