What’s Your Style Type? #1 Dramatic-Theatrical

SFTRY 1-2a

Illustration Sue Tait Porcaro


Last year I posted a series about the four seasonal color archetypes. Now we’re going to dive into the fascinating topic of the seven individual style archetypes. As described in Shopping for the Real You it’s a rare person whose features, coloring, expression, etc. reflect one single style facet. So this analysis is primarily for the purpose of training your eye to see differences and patterns unique to each style. Once you understand the basics of these types (or if you have been fortunate to have had a personal style consultation with John Kitchener) your own facets gradually come more and more into focus. But always keep in mind my motto:


                                 Train your eye; trust your gut; don’t obsess.


Let’s start with the most yang of the archetypes: Dramatic-Theatrical.


These people are not wallflowers. But they’re also not overly in-your-face. There’s a quiet intensity about Dramatics. They know they command the room so they don’t need to go through a lot of histrionics to get attention. The pure archetypes are generally quite tall, have one or more exaggerated features, and very often have coloring in the winter Bold range. John calls the winter color types “Striking/Contrast,” and that also pretty much sets the tone for this style archetype as well. They have clear ideas and opinions. You’ll see a lot of them in entertainment, as business leaders (well, maybe not in Silicon Valley) or on fashion runways.


Let’s look at a couple of examples from my Dramatic/Theatrical Pinterest page.


This is model Catherine Servel wearing a Dries van Noten coat. The scale of the stripes and the contrast of the colors plus her strong bone structure all say “drama.” EvenFree Magazine Download. PDF Magazines Latest and Back Issues. Magazines for All the petals of the pink lily, which because of its color would ordinarily read “spring,” are exaggerated in shape.  Also, her coloring, with that very pale skin and very dark hair allows for greater contrast in what she wears. Yes there’s something very romantic about her expression, her mouth and the color of the flower. But pay attention to the scale of the pattern and the over-sized shape of the coat. That’s pure Drama.


golden necklace and cuffsThis image (to the left)  is particularly interesting. If you look at her hair texture and eyes there is something vulnerable and soft there – almost Angelic. But the breast plate/necklace and wrist cuffs read almost “superhero.” And notice the intensity of her expression. The scale of the neck piece and cuffs, plus the size of her tote require a person who has a lot of Drama. There aren’t many people who could pull off those accessories. She certainly does. With aplomb!


There’s not a lot of ambiguity in these Dramatic type women. They catch your attention and it’s hard to look away from them. But there’s nothing forced about what they are expressing. They are simply being who they are – fundamentally, intrinsically, Dramatic.


Here’s an interesting one that demonstrates how to look for Drama in someone with a one shoulder black topcombination of styles. The exaggerated silhouette of the one sleeved top coupled with her pose and expression all read as Drama. However, this young woman has a lot of the Romantic style type as witnessed by her round or heart-shaped face shape (pure Dramatics often have a very oval-shaped face) and mouth. Still, her eyes have more intensity than that typically found in a pure Romantic type. Also, even though there is some warmth to her coloring she can clearly wear high contrast which, as mentioned earlier, is very often associated with Dramatics.


Nlack leather tee STP

Illustration Sue Tait Porcaro


Finally, let’s look at something a little bit atypical. Our redhead here is not a Bold or Winter type in coloring, but she still checks many of the boxes of the Dramatic style type. Like our previous model, she also has got some Romantic going on, but what she’s communicating is less “come hither” than “You talking to me?” There’s a kind of haughtiness in that expression. (Interesting that both these girls have hands on their hips.)


Although the cut of her “T-shirt” is fairly classic, what is it made of? Black leather! Black leather immediately says drama. And check out the high heeled booties: Again, black leather, with obvious hardware (large-scale zippers.) When you think of drama, think of what the word “yang” signifies: dynamism, substance, clarity. These are common elements of Drama in a person’s style facets.


So – based on these descriptions, how much drama do you think you have in your personal style? (FYI: in case you can’t tell from my picture – I’ve got zero!)


Black shopping bag illustration


The post What’s Your Style Type? #1 Dramatic-Theatrical appeared first on Shopping for the Real You.

 •  3 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 25, 2015 12:13
Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Elena (last edited Apr 06, 2015 04:05AM) (new)

Elena Hi, Andrea! I love your approach and your posts. Let me share with you my thoughts about the girl in the one sleeved top. Maybe even better example will be Verushka - she has certain feminine, "romantic" air in her too. I feel close to them: i'm tall - 6.1 feet, have "flat X" figure (Verushka is not X but it doesn't make great difference to my mind), slender, "sporty", "dinamic" but at the same time with something "romantic" in face and with Soft Summer color type.
I guess we are not pure Drama because we are low contrast, not enough bold, not enough angular. Real Drama style looks havy on us. We are not Famke Janssen and the less we are athletic Brigitte Nielsen.
We look awful in Natural things, in everything "plain" and relaxed (in laconic Classic as well), much worse than in Dramatic. Though Verushka carefully adopted Boho so fashionable in her youth.
We are not Romantics - not curvy, dollish, sensual. Too much Yang, dinamic, sporty. And surely we are just too big. Can't go far with the Baroque. Not Sophia Loren as well.
And finely are we a model type? All that unisex "comme des garcons", Zara casual, "separated from the body geometry" are not flattering us. In this case we are too feminine, LOL.
I dare think that we are just a new modern antropological type. And fortunately the attempts to cross feminine strokes with the dinamic, fitted, "sporty" silhouette can be seen on catwalks quite often now. Not necessarily Drama.


message 2: by Elena (last edited Apr 08, 2015 04:28AM) (new)

Elena Summarizing all said before, i define two types of the Dramatics.
1. Dramatic-Classic. Strong and sharp, sometimes athletic, sometimes "regal". "Snow Queen". What Kibbe described as the Drama. Clear-cut, even sharp, features, smooth texture, high contrast or need for high contrast (Winter color type or light blondes). Famke Janssen.
2. Dramatic-Natural. Strong but softened, feminine. Softened geometry, middle textured, low/middle contrast, distinct feminicity (may have some "romantic" features like X skeleton, round eyes with long lashes, soft lips). Verushka type.
More frequently seen European type that in my opinion Kibbe failed to discribe. Also he regretfully mixed up this type with Flamboyant Natural. Well, i'm not satisfied even with the terms here - what flamboyant for God's sake is in Jennifer Aniston, Cameron Diaz or Julia Roberts? Anyhow my aim is to separate from their type.
The difference is easily detected when we look what is flattering to both.
"Aniston type" is good in shapeless, soft and cosy, relaxed, laid back, oversized things, boy-meet-girl or "teenage girly", country, ethnic. In everything Kibbe prescribed for the Flamboyant Naturals. It's certainly an "outdoor"/"country" nice type.
On the contrary Dramatic-Natural is an "indoor"/"salon" type and can't wear all these "free people". The Dramatics need fitted silhouettes with distinct geometry and form. Our lines are strong - softened but not soft. We are "naturally elegant" (without crisp, too much polish, sophistication, striking drama) or "casual lux" (many thanks to Donna Karan) but we are never good in laid back, country, funny, unisex and we rarely feel comfortable with ethnic.
We can more successfully incorporate some Romantic elements - some curvy, traditionally feminine lines/forms, flower or jewellery motives. But without loosing "not complicated and not relaxed" impression (to avoid perplexing words "simple" and "strong"). We need to stay graceful.

And what Kibbe describes as Soft Drama (Sophia Loren type) i guess is not Drama at all. Exotic - yes, drama - no. I'd call it Flamboyant Romantic.


message 3: by Elena (last edited May 07, 2015 11:13AM) (new)

Elena Finally I decided that I am "Theatrical Romantic" in Kibbe's terms. I have suddenly realized what style are things in my wadrobe that suit me best. Then I've read again Kibbe's theory and everything coincides. Now I'm really happy but also very angry at Kibbe - I've lost a year (!) to clear out my type because he sais that tall women can be only Dramatics or Flamboyant Naturals. I guess we can be almost everything exept Gamine:) Please, exuse me for all this mess.


back to top