St Thomas???

I think we can safely say that February 21, 1173 was not one of Henry II’s favorite days, for it was upon this date that Thomas Becket was proclaimed a saint by the Church. They’d obviously put him on the fast-track for canonization since it was barely two years since he’d been martyred in Canterbury Cathedral. It is unlikely that Henry then viewed his erstwhile friend and adversary as saintly; he knew Becket too well for that. But it is quite possible that he changed his mind after he’d been driven to his dramatic, desperate penance before Becket’s tomb, since the Scots king was captured at Alnwick at the very time that Henry was on his knees, entreating Becket’s aid to save his kingdom. It certainly convinced their contemporaries and the rebellion fell apart, leaving Eleanor to pay for the sins of their sons.
7 likes ·   •  6 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 21, 2015 07:24
Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by David (new)

David Elkin Sometimes Saints get fast tracked and most of the time it can be attributed to other factors than their divine life style.


message 2: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I agree, David. Politics rears its ugly head everywhere, doesn't it? That must have been an irresistible temptation for the Church to give Henry a theological smackdown. :-)


message 3: by Loretta (new)

Loretta Tbh, Thomas didn't sound terribly saintly to me. More of an ego maniac, lol.


message 4: by David (new)

David Elkin But Lordy the movie remains one of my favorites. O'Toole and Burton were magnificent. Katie H. was pretty good as well :-)


message 5: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Do you mean Becket, David? I was a passionate fan of both Richard Burton and Peter O'Toole, but I hated that film. It totally distorted history; Becket was Norman, not Saxon, never caroused with Henry, etc. And the Henry portrayed in that film seemed like high-strung neurotic; the real Henry was many things, but not that. Eleanor fared as badly in her brief appearance. On the other hand, The Lion in Winter is one of my all-time favorite films. Yes, it took some historical liberties, too. But it was so well done and the acting so brilliant that I happily suspend disbelief for two hours every time I watch it again.


message 6: by David (new)

David Elkin I also loved the Lion in Winter. As for the history in Beckett, it was bad but at least it brought to the public the great men of that time. Sadly many movies distort history. I loved JFK, especially the character played by Donald Sutherland. (a very loose take of Col. L. Fletcher Prouty)

Absolutely horrible history.

I was 15 when the show came out, and I believe that was a key element to having me major in history in college, and helped create a life long love of it, especially English and European History.

Decent write up from wiki on the movie:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Becket_%...

I was unaware that the movie was based on a play by Jean Anouilh


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.