Why call it Islamic Terror
What difference does it make if we call it Islamic Terror or not? “A rose, by any other name …” The strategy appears to be that we must create more jobs so would-be terrorists will not be dissatisfied, we must close Gitmo so would-be terrorists will not be angry, etc. All the proposed solutions are based upon the premise that the problem is social unrest not the teachings of Islam. If that premise is mistaken, the solution is most likely wrong.
Paraphrased from the Qur’an—I read it myself: infidels (non-Muslims) have three choices. One, (the preferred) convert and become a practicing Muslim. Two, continue to practice their belief only in the privacy of their own home, submit to all the laws of Islam when outside their home, and pay a fee for not being Muslim. The third choice is to be killed. This is the basis of ISIS; they act it out every day. This is Islamic. This is not a share-the-wealth deal; it can’t be solved with community organizer skills. I submit that the vast majority of Muslims, who subject themselves to the laws of the nations where they live (instead of only to Allah as Islam requires), might just be the ones who have perverted the religion. Perhaps the Sunnah gives them cover for this contradiction. However, if their peaceful coexistence version is correct, they need to be in the forefront of convincing violent Muslims that the peaceful version of Islam overrules the Qur’an on these issues. The solution is to defeat the terrorist, Islamic version of the Qur’an or destroy the terrorists. They are acting on a faith they will gladly die for—an Islamic faith. They are not looking for jobs. They are Islamic Terrorists—just as the Crusaders were Christian Crusaders.
Paraphrased from the Qur’an—I read it myself: infidels (non-Muslims) have three choices. One, (the preferred) convert and become a practicing Muslim. Two, continue to practice their belief only in the privacy of their own home, submit to all the laws of Islam when outside their home, and pay a fee for not being Muslim. The third choice is to be killed. This is the basis of ISIS; they act it out every day. This is Islamic. This is not a share-the-wealth deal; it can’t be solved with community organizer skills. I submit that the vast majority of Muslims, who subject themselves to the laws of the nations where they live (instead of only to Allah as Islam requires), might just be the ones who have perverted the religion. Perhaps the Sunnah gives them cover for this contradiction. However, if their peaceful coexistence version is correct, they need to be in the forefront of convincing violent Muslims that the peaceful version of Islam overrules the Qur’an on these issues. The solution is to defeat the terrorist, Islamic version of the Qur’an or destroy the terrorists. They are acting on a faith they will gladly die for—an Islamic faith. They are not looking for jobs. They are Islamic Terrorists—just as the Crusaders were Christian Crusaders.
No comments have been added yet.
