danielradosh: .@jaketapper Not defending WH "all politics" spin but Q unmistakably endorses underlying "not-guilty verdict=failure for crim court" CW. No?

danielradosh: .@jaketapper Not defending WH "all politics" spin but Q unmistakably endorses underlying "not-guilty verdict=failure for crim court" CW. No?
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 12:57
No comments have been added yet.


Daniel Radosh's Blog

Daniel Radosh
Daniel Radosh isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Daniel Radosh's blog with rss.