Home
My Books
Browse ▾
Recommendations
Choice Awards
Genres
Giveaways
New Releases
Lists
Explore
News & Interviews
Genres
Art
Biography
Business
Children's
Christian
Classics
Comics
Cookbooks
Ebooks
Fantasy
Fiction
Graphic Novels
Historical Fiction
History
Horror
Memoir
Music
Mystery
Nonfiction
Poetry
Psychology
Romance
Science
Science Fiction
Self Help
Sports
Thriller
Travel
Young Adult
More Genres
Community ▾
Groups
Quotes
Ask the Author
Sign In
Join
Sign up
View profile
Profile
Friends
Groups
Discussions
Comments
Reading Challenge
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Quotes
Favorite genres
Friends’ recommendations
Account settings
Help
Sign out
Home
My Books
Browse ▾
Recommendations
Choice Awards
Genres
Giveaways
New Releases
Lists
Explore
News & Interviews
Genres
Art
Biography
Business
Children's
Christian
Classics
Comics
Cookbooks
Ebooks
Fantasy
Fiction
Graphic Novels
Historical Fiction
History
Horror
Memoir
Music
Mystery
Nonfiction
Poetry
Psychology
Romance
Science
Science Fiction
Self Help
Sports
Thriller
Travel
Young Adult
More Genres
Community ▾
Groups
Quotes
Ask the Author
When Words Won’t Come
We Intended to Stay
Missouri River Aqueduct Proposal is Greed-Driven Insanity
When insanity is driven by greed it suddenly turns to “reason.” That’s what’s been happening as Kansas corn farmers’ latest brainstorm, to build an aqueduct transporting Missouri River water 360 miles across Kansas, has been gaining momentum. According to a just-released U.S. Army Corps of Engineers draft report, the aqueduct would take 20 years to build and cost $18 billion. And then there would be “significantly higher” habitat restoration costs, according to John Grothause, chief of the water planning section for the corps’ Kansas City district. (How one restores marshlands along a flood plain is anyone’s guess.) Kansas Senate Natural Resources Committee Chairman Larry Powell estimated that the cost to irrigate a hundred acres of corn with aqueduct water would be $90,000. He dared to suggest it might not make a lot of sense to keep feeding corn to cows at that cost. (In my opinion it never made sense: grass-fed beef is healthier for humans. It makes even less sense to turn it into ethanol, which does virtually nothing for the environment.) But who is likely to bear the brunt of the cost? Not farmers, as Powell suggested, but taxpayers is my guess.
View more on Julene Bair's website »
Like
•
1 comment
•
flag
Published on
January 19, 2015 10:40
Comments
Showing 1-1 of 1
(1 new)
post a comment »
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Barbara
(new)
Jan 19, 2015 04:50PM
Yikes. We are a driven people. It is exhausting watching all the ways we miss the mark.
reply
|
flag
back to top
post a comment »
Add a reference:
Book
Author
Search for a book to add a reference
add:
link
cover
Author:
add:
link
photo
Julene Bair's Blog
Julene Bair's profile
34 followers
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.