Arguments
1. G-d exists because G-d cannot be expressed. 2. The English word "God" is incoherent. It lacks definition. It is, at best, a question (ie. which God?, what sort of God?, etcetera), but it primarily functions as an expression of dishonesty. 3. One writes G-d as an acknowledgment of the limits of human language. Hebrew demonstrates this limit; the language lacks a word for G-d and communicates entirely in euphemism – King of the Universe, My Lord, etcetera. 4. G-d is not logical; G-d exists entirely outside of logic. If one presupposes G-d's omnipotence, there is the obvious paradox. 5. G-d is other even to otherness. 6. G-d persists as a lack, as a problem both inexpressible and unavoidable. G-d exists in this problem outside any argument or doubt. 7. G-d's inexpressibility is explained in the Talmud as exile. 8. The universe exists because it is expressed; G-d is that which expresses it. 9. The inability of the universe to express G-d – the inability of one to express that which is one is expressed by – is the problem of communication. 10. G-d is the radical limit of language; therefore, it is the beginning of the anti-political communist adventure. 11. The adventure is doomed but remains, at heart, the only fundamentally optimistic project in a world ruled by the anarchy and nihilism of the market.
And so it is as it shall be.
