Spamming & Rating/Reviewing One's Own Book - Aggressive Promotion or Narcissism

Almost every literary website's discussion groups' rules include a ban on spamming. Whenever spamming does occur, it usually incites numerous posts by members of the group; expressing their displeasure for being subjected to the practice and/or their firm resolution never to purchase or even read a book written by the guilty party.

An author's response to negative reactions to aggressive self-promotional efforts usually include exclamations of shock for being accused of spamming or expressions of self-righteous dismay upon having their well-intended effort to promote their book unfairly attacked.

The exact meaning of just what spamming entails, as interpreted by the accused party and his/her accusers often differs.
The Merriam-Webster English Dictionary defines spamming as: "The use of electronic messaging systems (SPAM) especially advertising indiscriminately or sending messages repeatedly on the same site."

In my humble opinion, the formal definition is self-explanatory. If someone repeatedly and often posts advertisements for the same book on a thread designated for self-promotion or self-promotes on threads clearly not intended for self-promotion, such activity constitutes spamming.

Spammers in general have a habit of indulging in the "I" syndrome - the over-utilization of the personal pronouns: I, me, my, and mine, when promoting their work. Please note the use of the term over-utilization, not utilization. There is a distinct difference. The "I" syndrome is a clear symptom of narcissism.

The Merriam-Webster English Dictionary defines narcissism as: "Undue dwelling on one's own self or attainments."

Some authors choose to post a rating and review of their own work. With extremely few exceptions, they rate their book five-stars and proclaim it to be exceptionally entertaining and well-written. There is nothing wrong with such high self-esteem; however, it is often, if not always, looked upon with skepticism. An author's opinion of their own book is akin to a proud new parent's opinion of their new baby. The chances of either opinion being unbiased or dependable are slim to none.

I am certain that there will be some who disagree with the above statements. That is their prerogative. However; there is a popular business adage which I believe applies: "Your work speaks for itself. Don't interrupt!"
 •  2 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 25, 2014 17:49
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Alicia (new)

Alicia Ehrhardt Forgot to say before: I love your adage.

So true.

If it is good work, all you can do is tarnish it. If it is bad work, you shouldn't be able to shore it up.

Unfortunately, this is the real world, self-promoters make lots of money (some of them), and the squeaky wheel gets the grease and the review.

I think those of us who believe this may have the problem of being so afraid of spamming that we don't promote when we should.

So: go read my book. Heh heh. (You may try the sample on Amazon to see if you like my writing. In fact, I highly recommend that to everyone. Sampling, I mean. My book may not be for them.)


message 2: by Jim (new)

Jim Vuksic Alicia wrote: "Forgot to say before: I love your adage.

So true.

If it is good work, all you can do is tarnish it. If it is bad work, you shouldn't be able to shore it up.

Unfortunately, this is the real world..."


Alicia,

Each Goodreads discussion group provides its particular rules and protocol regarding self-promotion. Authors may promote as much as they desire within the established parameters. So promote away!

Thank you for viewing the blog post and sharing your thoughts on the subject. I wish you success with your writing.

Jim Vuksic


back to top