How to handle negative reviews

Chuck Wendig has an entertaining post up: Five ways to respond to a negative review: a helpful guide. Funny! Also topical, as it happens. I’m sure it’s not a coincidence that Chuck posted about negative reviews this week!


Those of you who aren’t in the writer/blogger Twitter stream and who don’t happen to follow the right blogs, might have missed this thing where an author named Katherine Hale tracked down a particular reviewer and stalked her — went to her actual house, called her at home and at work, etc. It was big news on my Twitter a couple days ago, and no wonder.


Personally, I think Hale actually must be suffering from some kind of emotional dysfunction, not that I’m a psychiatrist, but read the article if you like and I think you’ll agree that her actions and thoughts were not normal throughout any part of the story she relates. From obsessively making corrections to finished work already on the shelf, through tweeting while drunk, right along to actually getting stalkery and scary. It was all rather disturbing. I don’t think it’s appropriate to pile on Hale, though, since she does in fact appear to be actually crazy. (I do think it would be perfectly appropriate for the blogger to press criminal charges, since being crazy does not mean you get to stalk people and it might be a good idea for the blogger to hire a lawyer and forcibly point this out.) But the great villain of the piece is actually The Guardian, which saw fit, for some reason, to publish Hale’s article as though it approves of stalking. Some editor there seems to think it’s keen to let an author publish an article gloating about her actually illegal stalking activities, which is . . . words fail me.


Anyway, back to Chuck’s post, here is a short version of his advice regarding negative reviews. The actual post is much longer because, you know, this *is* Chuck Wendig and brevity is not his thing.


1. Do Nothing. Bad reviews happen.


2. Hey, No, Seriously, Do Nothing. Wait, why are we still here?


3. Goddamnit, I Just Told You — Hey, Where Are You Going? Whoa, whoa, whoa. Where are you going? What are you planning on doing?


4. Fine, Slake Your Rage In Proper Rage-Slaking Ways. This review is like a seed stuck in your teeth, isn’t it? Fine. Fine. Invoke your rage. Quietly.


5. Oh, For The Sake Of Sweet Saint Fuck, You’re Gonna Respond, Aren’t You? No no no no noooooo – You’re doing it anyway, aren’t you?


And then he provides advice for how to minimize the potential fallout if you do respond to a negative review.


Which is all very well and good, but I have slightly different advice.


1. If you see one, two, or maybe even three stars on a review, don’t read it.


There, problem solved. Now there is no need to go on to Chuck’s Helpful Guide.

8 likes ·   •  7 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 22, 2014 11:13
Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Sherwood (new)

Sherwood Smith Compared to Hale, the author who frantically pulls together friends and "street teams" to post five star burbles in flailing response to a single bad review is emotionally mature and professional by comparison.

Wendig's real advice--don't read reviews, they are not for you--is the real deal.


message 2: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier Almost anything is emotionally mature in comparison. I really think Hale is unbalanced -- and The Guardian wrong in every way to encourage her to showcase that apparent fact.


message 3: by Sherwood (new)

Sherwood Smith Rachel wrote: "Almost anything is emotionally mature in comparison. I really think Hale is unbalanced -- and The Guardian wrong in every way to encourage her to showcase that apparent fact."

Yup. Pot-stirring, maybe? Or an editor thoroughly disgruntled about drive-by trolling?


message 4: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier I can't imagine. I really can't.


message 5: by Estara (last edited Oct 23, 2014 10:37AM) (new)

Estara I read some of the linked articles at Smart Bitches, Trashy Books and Dear Authors and it is so, so scary.

On the other hand, maybe because I have never become a big part of any forum here and on Amazon, the friendly circle of reviewers I've found here with inclusion of various author's blog posts and the ease of use of the software have made me stay with Goodreads anyway.

You know what's sad? That because I read and review English books I am probably so much safer than many of my online reviewing friends who live in the UK and US. Each year I add other names to the list of authors not to touch with a bargepole, ever.

Each year I read authors on my LJ friends feed list and here I am also reminded that you are such a boon to my interests and my developing of my understanding of the world.

Thank you for writing and sharing and having common sense, all you authors with brains as well as hearts.


message 6: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier The Smart Bitches post was one of the best I've read.

I'm sure the risk of pinging the crazy radar of an unbalanced person is small . . . but how nasty if you happen to be the one who gets targeted. I can definitely understand people taking a big step back from blogging and/or reviewing after reading about what happened to Blythe. It's a real shame.


message 7: by Estara (new)

Estara This year seems to be the year for trying to chill voices. Cases in point: GamerGate, Ellora's Cave trying to silence Dear Author and now this Kathleen Hale, who seems to have stalkery history, most likely using her nepotist powers in via her prospective in-laws in getting an article into the Guardian celebrating her stalker nature.


back to top