Interstitial Moment

Interstitial Moment


 


At 75, I almost (almost) don’t care what people think about me or my work. The work is out there and readers have every right to like it or not. They can think it is life-changing or a load of codswallop. Once the piece is out there, it no longer belongs to me but to them. (I am quick to add: in the deeper sense, not the copyright sense.)


 


But here’s the warning part: My job is not to write what the reader wants, but what I want. What the story (or poem) wants. I have to tell  the truth  on the slant (as Emily Dickinson said) as I see it, as the story comes to and through me. That’s all I owe anyone, all I owe myself–to tell Truth on the slant.


What I have problems with more and more are people who–because they love my work–think they somehow own me. That they truly know me.


 


They don’t. They only know the work.


 


And when they meet me online or at a conference and if they get to talk to me without my Jane Yolen headdress on, they always say things like,


“Oh–I didn’t know you were so funny/silly/anarchic/endearing/profane/ boring” whatever. Because they don’t know me, you see, only the work.


 


The thing readers like that forget is that I can revise the work over and over. I listen to the characters. So—yes, the story pulls through me and some of me (sometimes a lot of me) scrapes off. But then I revise it to make it fit the story.


 


So that’s not really me. It’s the work. Don’t confuse the two.


 


Years ago, I received a piece of fan mail from an adult, (it was clearly not a child) who loved my picture book Rainbow Rider. This was in the ‘70s, so put this into context. The letter spoke of how we were soul mates and how he wanted to meet me to share lives. To tell the truth, it was a very scary little piece of mail. I wrote back that Rainbow Rider was a made-up story, ,that I wrote a lot of stories—some as mythic as that one and others as profane as a piece of soap. He wrote back and said I was an awful person, a liar, and he would never read anything I wrote again.


 


He missed the point. All storytellers are liars. We make up things to get at the truth. The truth of the story and—if we are lucky and have revised well—the truth of the world as well.


 


On the slant.

19 likes ·   •  3 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 25, 2014 05:38
Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by calico (new)

calico Rosenberg ive thought the same thing about actors. or more accurately, ive in one moment been struck with the overwhelming feeling that i [empathize] greatly with a character but in the next realize they are a character... and while many actors are repetitively typecast and may in fact resemble or lend traits to their roles, well..the analogy continues to a tee, i think.
people are so silly in their profoundly expansive lack of understanding for the term 'fiction.' On this page I have devloped some fondness for you as a person, I guess, but I feel the same way about authors/singers/whatever... I enjoy reading/listening. The persons character etc. does not affect the entertainment value therewithin and therefore does not impact my experience/matter.
regardless, i have just now been sleeplessly reliving my youth via the 'if you liked this you'll like' --[which began as I found myself with only a friends copy of a harry potter sequel to read before i travel back to the other side of the country, where i presume i will eventually find another copy to resume from and that a page # would be helpful]--well, i am at this point utterly distracted. I came upon dragon's blood and remembered how much I loved those books, and reading a picture book of yours to the children i used to babysit, who had allegedly met you at our library or some such, and I remember being hopelessly envious... more memories ensued. I suppose I just wanted to express my admiration/long-lived fondness. and again, this is just some sleepless rambling


message 2: by Jane (new)

Jane Yolen Sleepless rambling or not, it was fun to read. Thanks.

Jane Yolen


message 3: by calico (new)

calico Rosenberg oh yes, i meant to include that there is still something to be said for seeing that another person is expressing and has therefore experienced/fashioned a sentiment you may not have realized was not nearly/exclusive to yourself--regardless of who is supposedly expressing it


back to top