Secularists show true colors in reaction to SCOTUS ruling


A demonstrator in support of the federal contraceptive mandate chants outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington in reaction to Hobby Lobby ruling June 30. (CNS photo/Jonathan Ernst, Reuters)

by Russell Shaw | CWR blog


The long expected showdown between faith and secularism has begun


Considered either as an ideology or as a program of action, secularism is deeply coercive. Reactions to the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate make that abundantly clear.


Secularists typically think of themselves as champions of liberation, empowerment, and freedom of choice. Take care, though: disagree on religious grounds with something these people espouse, and they’ll be after you with fire and sword, seeking to make you fall in line. So much for liberation, empowerment, and freedom of choice.


Consider the secularist response to the June 30 decision by a five-member majority of the Supreme Court: proprietors of family-owned businesses don’t have to provide employees with health insurance coverage for abortifacient drugs the owners object to in conscience.


A “deeply dismaying decision,” the New York Times huffed about the Hobby Lobby ruling. The deeply dismayed newspaper accused Justice Alito and his four colleagues of giving owners of closely held, for-profit companies “an unprecedented right to impose their religious views on employees.”


“Nothing in the contraceptive coverage rule prevented the companies’ owners from worshiping as they choose or advocating against coverage and use of the contraceptives they don’t like,” the newspaper said. Quite so. The problem was that the rule forced people of faith to pay for something they judged morally abhorrent.


As Justice Alito pointed out, government has other ways of giving people contraceptives and abortifacients besides forcing business owners with faith-based objections to become its accomplices. Unless of course making them accomplices was itself part of the project.


The Washington Post was even more blunt in exposing its secularist premises...


Continue reading on the Catholic World Report blog.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on July 10, 2014 14:16
No comments have been added yet.


Carl E. Olson's Blog

Carl E. Olson
Carl E. Olson isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Carl E. Olson's blog with rss.