Developing Characters (or Die Mary Sues Die!!!)



Welcome back!

If you recall, last time we were discussing identifying characters for potential stories.

Since completing the final book of my Riddle in Stone series (plug! plug! plug!), I've been in the process of writing something new.  I originally was going to write about the exploits of a teenage homeless boy who was streetwise, but socially challenged.  I got about 25,000 words in before I realized that the character was a bit of a cliché.  After all, it seems in every fantasy story there's always the plucky street kid rising up above his station to show the snooty rich people what life is always about.  So I dumped him and tried to come up with something a little more unique.

After a great deal of day dreaming, I strolled across a young woman named Natalie. At first glance, Nat came across as a bit of a bitch. She's opinionate and quick to anger and wanting to be independent so much, she tends to push people away. 

Still a bit of a cliché, right?  I mean, the few women who appear as leads in fantasy stories tend to be boat rockers and a perpetual thorn in the side of the manly men who wield the swords. (What's the expression?  Well-behaved women rarely make history?)

Or they tend to be the wielder of swords themselves ... deadly bad asses just who happen to have breasts (evidently they have to have big breasts and long, flowing, clean hair, but no clothes that fit them--judging by the book covers).

So Nat needs to be something different. She can't be a female version of Conan and she can't be super smart know-it-all.  In other words, she can't develop into a "Mary Sue."

If you don't know what  a Mary Sue is, click on a few of these links.  They actually go into detail about the history of the term, Mary Sue, and give examples.  Suffice to say, Mary Sues are characters who can do everything brilliantly. 

For example, I'm reading a fantasy story where the main character is young and has powerful magical abilities and can sing like nobody else and can fight and is good-looking and is able to learn languages after just hearing a few words--so forth and so on.  He even loses his virginity to a god who typically kills the men she beds; but she lets this guy go because he's SOOOO cute and cleaver and plays the lute beautifully.   UGH!!!   I'm actually rooting for the villain in the story just so I can see this idiot get taken down a few pegs!

Okay. So that's a Mary Sue (or  Marty Sue for guys). You get the picture.

I hate Mary Sues.  Nobody is like that in real life.  Even the star football player and homecoming king in high school had acne or looked like crap in their polyester McDonald's uniform.  Nobody is good at everything!! If they are, I really don't want to be around them.  They'd just make me feel like a loser. 

Characters are the same way.  They need to have weaknesses.  Not weakness like Kryptonite, that only come around when it is convenient for the author.  They need to have blind spots in their character. They need to have warts and prejudices and ... well, be human (even when they're not).

So Nat is a bit of a cliché at this point and I need her to develop, but not into a Mary Sue.  What do I do? 

I don't know how other authors handle this, but I sit down and write. 

I have about 65,000 words written about Natalie.  The first 10,000 were pretty one-dimensional.  She's angry. She wants something she can't have. She pissed at the world for all the injustices it holds.  Still cliché, right?

By the second 10,000 word, she began to develop other traits.  She isn't very attractive. She isn't ugly, exactly. She just doesn't look "girly." (And she never will!  Man, I hate how beauty and success always have to go together!!!  Not everybody is a supermodel and that's okay!) Anyway, Nat is often taken to be a boy. Guys will talk to her, but only to ask about her "cute" friend.  Do you know the type?

By the third 10,000 words, I found that she has to take care of her family, whom she loves, but she's being crushed by the responsibility. She hates her life, yet she feels guilty for hating it, because she know it could be so much worse. She know what she needs to do, but ... damn ... she wishes she didn't have to. She wants so much more, but doesn't know what.  She believes in rules, but finds that she has to break them in order to provide for her brothers and sisters.  Still a bit cliché, but a little fuller.

And so forth. 

I think too many writers won't start writing until they have "everything figured out."   As a result, they never really get past the first page.   I tend to write to figure things out.   I just throw words on a page and see what happens.  Who is this character?  What does she want? How does she stand out in a crowd?  Or does she?  If she could have three wishes, what would she wish for?  She finds a pile of money in the road, what does she do?  What is her guiding philosophy ... and when is she willing to break it?

It's a process.  A slow process, but a process nonetheless.

Speaking of which, Nat is knocking on my head.   Better go write about her.

I hope all is well with you!  See you next time!

Rob
 •  4 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 13, 2014 07:50
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Callum (new)

Callum Whoa, you don't like The Kingkiller Chronicle? I always figured Kvothe was more of a tragic hero than a Marty Sue, and that his flaws balanced out his preternatural skills.
Plus you have to wonder how reliable Kvothe is as a narrator...


message 2: by Robert (new)

Robert Olson Have you ever considered that the old cliches make a good fantasy story? People like to feel that they can escape their own problems because the street urchin could. They fantasize about being just like this character because there are things there they identify with. I think (maybe incorrectly) that fans of fantasy books feel a bit downtrodden and maybe picked on for their interests. So when an unfit, librarian with a stutter can take on some goblins it makes people feel that they too can take on their own personal goblins. Cliches are what the, generalized, people like, that's why they aren't called fads.

But...I am also willing to accept that everything I have just said is wrong, I'm not married to it. AND I actually know nothing about writing. Good luck with your new story!


message 3: by Robert (last edited May 15, 2014 04:55AM) (new)

Robert Evert Callum wrote: "Whoa, you don't like The Kingkiller Chronicle? I always figured Kvothe was more of a tragic hero than a Marty Sue, and that his flaws balanced out his preternatural skills.
Plus you have to wonder ..."



Oooh!! I never thought about Kvothe being unreliable as a narrator. Boy, THAT would be a terrific story. Imagine a character talking endlessly about his exploits and then, in the final act of the book, he has to save the town...but it turns out he was BSing all along. Nice twist.


message 4: by Robert (new)

Robert Evert Robert wrote: "Have you ever considered that the old cliches make a good fantasy story? People like to feel that they can escape their own problems because the street urchin could. They fantasize about being jus..."

You make an interesting point, Robert...about cliches and fads. Perhaps cliches can be considered "old standbys"? When is something a standard and when is it a cliche or fad? Thanks for giving me something to think about.

The difficulty I have as a writer is whenever I pitch a story, my agent or publisher or editor will say, "That's too much like... x." And often I haven't even read "x" story! To get a publisher's attention, they want something fresh and new. Yet it seems like the best new authors of average ability can hopeful is new twists on old plots. Joseph Campbell talks a good deal about this the Power of Myth. Is it even possible to come up with something completely unique?


back to top

Neurotic Novelists of the World Unite!

Robert Evert
A blog about a neurotic novelist who wants to become sane.
Follow Robert Evert's blog with rss.