The hamster’s head. The importance of POV part 2

article-new-thumbnail_ehow_images_a06_07_3v_hamsters-care-training-800x800


Abso…and so you should well be praying little hamstahs after that little display the other day. The general..untitled


AND, the fact WW3 was declared over point of view in a story.  PLUS the signing of a publishing contract with Catherine Cavendish, author of untitledto name a few AND a few to come soon too, keep your eyes peeled for Linden Manor, article-new-thumbnail_ehow_images_a06_07_3v_hamsters-care-training-800x800


to produce works of great hamster merit, such asuntitled


 


images1


untitled


DO step aside Mr Dickens.


All that has saved you from going back to the cages on this occasion is that you did SORT of get it right re point of view. hm


 


You must have read the lovely Sharon Struth’s post on the subject.


http://writerswow.blogspot.com/2014/03/wwow-writing-from-guerillas-point-of.html


TheHourglass_BySharonStruth-600x900


SO….Point of view. Well, cards on the table, this is one of the things I found hardest setting out to try and get published. You see you think you can have as many viewpoints as you like in a scene and in a story. But to quote my heroine, her ladyship Fury, herself…


there are rules.


You can argue this all you like…


imagesTJNFTL7Kbut as Sharon Struth also says, it makes that manuscript you’ve slaved over like the proverbial hot stove, look unprofessional, which is not the name of the game.


Okay. Some of it is a matter of trend. For example ….untitled


God wouldn’t have the scene or the story–sorry Ratsy–because the omnipresent is out of fashion. Yep and some  of the best known writers ever, wrote that way too. Mr Dickens to quote but one.


images3Q7S4CUB


The rabbit, if he’s a secondary character wouldn’t have the scene or the story either.


Don’t shoot me. I’m only the poor writer trying to get it right the very same as you are. The rabbit is just …..the rabbit.


One of my first efforts, a western story  penned at the age of 17 started with 6 people–none of whom were what they seemed– arriving in a small town. images


There was the hooker, the hooker’s sister, the hooker’s jack of all trades, the ranch hand, the bank robber, the housewife. Each with a little secret in tow, plus the potential to blow the town apart.


Of course I gave the scene to the stage coach driver. Well.  He was best placed to give us the low down, wasn’t he?


imagesEEWZD5CF


Abso.


To this day I still think he was, cos the story was about the impact this six had on the town. I might still think so. But that would be all. AS Fez would say to the coachman…imagesMTDUJYED


cos he wasn’t after that scene. Not only that he had a touch of the Clint Eastwood’s about him.


No name.


But there’s probably worse mistakes to make. There’s……


imagesHL6GTDKS Head hopping in other words. You know where one minute we’re with one character and then with each successive paragraph we’re with another. Again you can argue it’s great to know what each person is thinking. Till you’re blue in the face too.


Meantime the slush pile reader has also hopped...it…to the next submission. Yours is in the trash basket.conv


Yeah, yeah, I know. you look at books from 20 years ago and they are full of head hopping. But this is 20 years on. It’s a tough biz for those who want to succeed.


So?  POV. What are the rules?  Well, these days it seems you tell the story from one or two viewpoints. Probably, unless you’re Tonto’s horse or something, taking  a new slant on The Lone Ranger,  you tell it mainly from one with a  dash of two.ham1


You decide at the start of the scene whose head you’re in. You might stick in that head for the whole scene. The whole chapter, or chapters too. If you switch, the advice is don’t then switch back again in that scene. Do it afterwards by all means.


Personally, in terms of viewpoint I start the scene in the head of the character with the most to lose at this particular point.


Sharon Struth makes great points about why it’s good to have, or not have the other person’s viewpoint. Think of the suspense for a kick off if we don’t know what a character is thinking, while the other is busily hamstering beavering away.


Then there’s the fun to be had from them coming at something from entirely opposing angles…….


m


passi


extracts copyright The Unraveling of Lady Fury. Etopia Press.


You can also mirror what your other characters…any of them, no matter  how minor…are thinking. so your scene isn’t white space that way.  j


imagesW5TX3G32


 


comv


 


HardToHold


conv62


imagesU4PQFMGZ


 


 


 


 


Filed under: heroes, heroines, writing Tagged: Catherine Cavendish, Hard To Hold, Incy Black, Linden Manor, Point of view, Sharon Struth, The Hourglass, the Second Wife, The Unraveling of Lady Fury, writing, Writing tips
1 like ·   •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on April 26, 2014 07:37
No comments have been added yet.